Development of a Class-Based Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (C-MESMA) Approach for Analyzing Urban Environments

Multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA) has been widely applied for estimating fractional land covers from remote sensing imagery. MESMA has proven effective in addressing inter-class and intra-class endmember variability by allowing pixel-specific endmember combinations. This method, however, assumes that each land cover type has an equal probability of being included in the model, and the one with the least estimation error (e.g., root mean square error) was chosen as the “best-fit” model. Such an approach may mistakenly include a land cover class in the model and overestimate its abundance, or it might omit a class from the model and subsequently lead to underestimation. To address this problem, this paper developed a land cover class-based multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (C-MESMA) method. In particular, a support vector machine (SVM) method with reflectance spectra and spectral indices, including the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the biophysical composition index (BCI), and the ratio normalized difference soil index (RNDSI), were employed to classify the image into six land cover classes: pure impervious surface area (ISA), pure vegetation, pure soil, ISA-vegetation, vegetation-soil, and vegetation-ISA-soil. With the information of land cover classes, an individual MESMA method was applied to each mixed class. Finally, the fractional maps were derived through integrating land cover fractions of each land cover class. Quantitative analysis of the resulting percent ISA (%ISA) and comparative analyses with traditional MESMA indicate that C-MESMA improved the estimation accuracy of %ISA.

[1]  Qian Du,et al.  Modified multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis for mapping impervious surfaces in urban environments , 2014 .

[2]  C. Deng,et al.  A spatially adaptive spectral mixture analysis for mapping subpixel urban impervious surface distribution , 2013 .

[3]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[4]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[5]  D. Roberts,et al.  Mapping two Eucalyptus subgenera using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis and continuum-removed imaging spectrometry data , 2011 .

[6]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Mapping vegetation in an urban area with stratified classification and multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis , 2013 .

[7]  John T. Finn,et al.  Use of the Average Mutual Information Index in Evaluating Classification Error and Consistency , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  D. Roberts,et al.  Endmember selection for multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis using endmember average RMSE , 2003 .

[9]  Carmen DeNavas-Walt,et al.  Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2004 , 2006 .

[10]  D. Roberts,et al.  Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) to map burn severity levels from Landsat images in Mediterranean countries , 2013 .

[11]  D. Lobell,et al.  Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. , 2000 .

[12]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[13]  S. Linden,et al.  Support vector regression and synthetically mixed training data for quantifying urban land cover , 2013 .

[14]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[15]  Fenglei Fan,et al.  Extraction and Analysis of Impervious Surfaces Based on a Spectral Un-Mixing Method Using Pearl River Delta of China Landsat TM/ETM+ Imagery from 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Sensors.

[16]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[17]  A. French,et al.  Effect of image spatial and spectral characteristics on mapping semi-arid rangeland vegetation using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA) , 2013 .

[18]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Mapping the spectral variability in photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic vegetation, soils, and shade using AVIRIS , 1992 .

[19]  D. Lu,et al.  Extraction of urban impervious surfaces from an IKONOS image , 2009 .

[20]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[21]  D. Roberts,et al.  Hierarchical Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) of hyperspectral imagery for urban environments , 2009 .

[22]  C. Deng,et al.  BCI: A biophysical composition index for remote sensing of urban environments , 2012 .

[23]  Jungho Im,et al.  Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review , 2011 .

[24]  John B. Adams,et al.  Quantitative subpixel spectral detection of targets in multispectral images. [terrestrial and planetary surfaces] , 1992 .

[25]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  D. Roberts,et al.  Comparing endmember selection techniques for accurate mapping of plant species and land cover using imaging spectrometer data , 2012 .

[27]  Le Wang,et al.  Improving urban classification through fuzzy supervised classification and spectral mixture analysis , 2007 .

[28]  S. Tompkins,et al.  Optimization of endmembers for spectral mixture analysis , 1997 .

[29]  Miao Li,et al.  RNDSI: A ratio normalized difference soil index for remote sensing of urban/suburban environments , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  Jixian Zhang Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends , 2010 .

[31]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  Assimilation of endmember variability in spectral mixture analysis for urban land cover extraction , 2013 .

[32]  Simon J. Hook,et al.  Synergies Between VSWIR and TIR Data for the Urban Environment: An Evaluation of the Potential for the Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI) , 2012 .

[33]  Xiuping Jia,et al.  Controlled spectral unmixing using extended Support Vector Machines , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[34]  Chong Liu,et al.  The Integrated Use of DMSP-OLS Nighttime Light and MODIS Data for Monitoring Large-Scale Impervious Surface Dynamics: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[35]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Detecting Jack Pine Budworm Defoliation Using Spectral Mixture Analysis: Separating Effects from Determinants , 1999 .

[36]  Jeff Settle,et al.  On the effect of variable endmember spectra in the linear mixture model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Endmember variability in Spectral Mixture Analysis: A review , 2011 .

[38]  D. Roberts,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil , 2007 .

[39]  Conghe Song,et al.  Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability? , 2005 .

[40]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .