Comparison between blade-element models of propellers

Blade-element models are the most common models for the analysis of propeller aerodynamics, performance calculations and propeller design. In spite of their simplicity these models are very efficient and accurate. Blade-element models use the local induced velocities as an input thus they should be combined with another model in order to calculate these induced velocities. Various models are used for the calculation of the induced velocity, where the most popular ones include: momentum, simplified-momentum, lifting-line (prescribed and free wake), and vortex (McCormick and Theodorsen) models. The paper describes the various models, compares their results and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each one. The results indicate that the Bladeelement/simplified-momentum model offers very good accuracy together with high efficiency. For propeller performance calculations during steady axial flight, where most of the cross-sections do not experience stall, detailed and complicated models for calculating the induced velocities do not show advantages over the simple bladeelement/simplified-momentum model,

[1]  L. Long,et al.  3-D time-accurate CFD simulations of wind turbine rotor flow fields , 2006 .

[2]  Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.  Tip Loss Correction for Actuator/Navier–Stokes Computations , 2005 .

[3]  Aviv Rosen,et al.  Free Wake Model of Hovering Rotors Having Straight or Curved Blades , 1988 .

[4]  S. Goldstein.  On the Vortex Theory of Screw Propellers , 1929 .

[5]  A. Rosen,et al.  Efficient method for calculating the axial velocities induced along rotating blades by trailing helical vortices , 1984 .

[6]  L. J. Bober,et al.  Summary of advanced methods for predicting high speed propeller performance , 1980 .

[7]  J. Mark Janus.  General Aviation Propeller-Airframe Integration Simulations , 2006 .

[8]  John L Crigler.  Application of Theodorsen's theory to propeller design , 1948 .

[9]  Quentin Wald,et al.  The Wright Brothers propeller theory and design , 2001 .

[10]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Aerodynamic Modeling of Morphing Wings Using an Extended Lifting-Line Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Barnes W. McCormick,et al.  Aerodynamics of V/STOL flight , 1967 .

[12]  Theodore Theodorsen,et al.  Theory of propellers , 1948 .

[13]  John Horlock,et al.  Actuator disk theory , 1978 .

[14]  Douglas F. Hunsaker,et al.  A Numerical Blade Element Approach to Estimating Propeller Flowfields , 2007 .

[15]  Krishnamurty Karamcheti,et al.  Principles of ideal-fluid aerodynamics , 1966 .

[16]  John Elwell,et al.  A Computer Model for the Evaluation of Helicopter Fire Control Systems , 1969 .

[17]  Makoto Kobayakawa.  Flow field around a propeller by Navier-Stokes equation analysis , 1988 .

[18]  Ohad Gur,et al.  Propeller Performance at Low Advance Ratio , 2005 .

[19]  David R. Clark,et al.  The Free Wake Analysis A Method For The Prediction Of Helicopter Rotor Hovering Performance. , 1969 .

[20]  Y. Sandak,et al.  Aeroelastically adaptive propeller using blades’ root flexibility , 2004, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[21]  Albert J. Evans,et al.  A Wind-tunnel Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Full-scale Sweptback Propeller and Two Related Straight Propellers , 1951 .

[22]  Quentin R. Wald.  The aerodynamics of propellers , 2006 .