Species structure of North European bumblebee communities

The structure of North European bumblebee communities was studied on regional and local scales. As the bumblebee proboscis has a potentially important role in resource partitioning, the structure of bumblebee communities was analysed in terms of proboscis length relationships. The regional numbers of bumblebee species in 100-km squares in NW Europe were frequently between 11 and 15. No obvious south to north gradient in species richness was found. The slightly lower regional numbers of species in Finland are suggested to be due to the lack of alpine habitats with associated species. England and Ireland have fewer species than equally sized areas in Scandinavia. Most of the bumblebee species (25/29) in Northern Europe have proboscises shorter than 12 mm. Short-tongued species tend to be more widely distributed than those with long tongues. B. hortorum, a long-tongued species, deviates clearly from this trend by being more widely distributed than the other species with a long proboscis, all of which are either habitat (alpine) or food specialists. Local communities consist of a number of coexisting species, most of which differ only slightly in terms of proboscis length. Only a few species (1-3 per community) have long proboscises and these species are seldom abundant. When species in the realized communities were compared in terms of proboscis length distances, no statistically significant differences were revealed from distances expected on the basis of random sampling from the local species pool. The same was the case also when only the abundant species were taken into account. Thus, propositions advocating proboscis length differences and food competition as the single assembly rule of bumblebee communities should be supported by good evidence. Other conceivable factors include competition for nesting sites, nest predation, and other mechanisms that shape the present-day local communities and regional species pools.

[1]  Esa Ranta,et al.  Why are there so many species? Spatio-temporal heterogeneity and northern bumblebee communities , 1981 .

[2]  E. Ranta,et al.  Habitat and food utilization in a subarctic bumblebee community. , 1980 .

[3]  E. Ranta,et al.  Resource partitioning in bumblebees: the significance of differences in proboscis length. , 1980 .

[4]  J. Connell.  Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[5]  K. N. Rabenold.  A Reversed Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Avian Communities of Eastern Deciduous Forests , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area Relationship , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[7]  A. Pekkarinen.  Morphometric, colour and enzyme variation in bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus) in Fennoscandia and Denmark , 1979 .

[8]  D. Simberloff.  Using Island Biogeographic Distributions to Determine if Colonization is Stochastic , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[9]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, migration and population mechanics , 1977, Nature.

[10]  D. Inouye.  Species Structure of Bumblebee Communities in North America and Europe , 1977 .

[11]  P. T. Fenchel,et al.  Theories of Populations in Biological Communities , 1977, Ecological Studies.

[12]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  THE FORAGING SPECIALIZATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL BUMBLEBEES , 1976 .

[13]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Competition and the structure of bird communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[14]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[15]  E. Tramer,et al.  On Latitudinal Gradients in Avian Diversity , 1974 .

[16]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Competition and Regional Coexistence , 1974 .

[17]  K. Richards.  Biology of Bombus polaris Curtis and B. hyperboreus Schonherr at Lake Hazen, Northwest Territories (Hymenoptera; Bombini) , 1973 .

[18]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[19]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[20]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[21]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Medler.  Morphometric Studies on Bumble Bees , 1962 .

[23]  B. Hubendick.  ASPECTS ON THE DIVERSITY OF THE FRESH-WATER FAUNA , 1962 .

[24]  P. Hänninen.  Bumblebee species on red clover in Central Finland , 1962 .

[25]  A. G. Fischer.  LATITUDINAL VARIATIONS IN ORGANIC DIVERSITY , 1960 .

[26]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.