Infering from text: Some factors influencing which inferences will be made∗

Two studies are reported in which the importance of an event in a story was systematically varied to test whether this would affect the likelihood that inferences about the event would be made. Eight versions of each of six 500‐word stories, identical except for the sections varied in order to manipulate the importance of the event and the salience of material which cued the target inference, shared the same target inference. Importance was varied without changing the plausibility of the inference. In half of the passage versions, the “inference” was explicitly stated in the text. High school students served as subjects. In the first experiment, inference was tested using multiple‐choice recognition, while a cued recall test was employed in the second experiment. The results of both studies confirmed that people are more likely to make an important rather than unimportant inference. Highly salient premises were also found to increase the probability that an inference would be made.

[1]  Ronald E. Johnson Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. , 1970 .

[2]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[3]  Richard C. Anderson How to Construct Achievement Tests to Assess Comprehension , 1972 .

[4]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Taking different perspectives on a story. , 1977 .

[5]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963) , 1963 .

[6]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse , 1977 .

[7]  Richard C. Anderson Control of Student Mediating Processes During Verbal Learning and Instruction1 , 1970 .

[8]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[9]  Ernest T. Goetz,et al.  Inferences in the Comprehension of and Memory for Text , 1977 .

[10]  Richard Jackson Harris,et al.  Psychology of Pragmatic Implication: Information Processing Between the Lines. , 1978 .

[11]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  The role of inferences in discourse comprehension , 1976 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  W. Brewer,et al.  Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[14]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[15]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Instantiation of general terms , 1976 .

[16]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences , 1973 .