The Impact of Visualizing Design Gradients for Human Designers

Mixed-initiative Procedural Content Generation (PCG) refers to tools or systems in which a human designer works with an algorithm to produce game content. This area of research remains relatively under-explored, with the majority of mixedinitiative PCG level design systems using a common set of search-based PCG algorithms. In this paper, we introduce a mixed-initiative tool employing Exhaustive PCG (EPCG) for puzzle level design to further explore mixed-initiative PCG. We run an online human subject study in which individuals use the tool with an EPCG component turned on or off. Our analysis of the results demonstrates that, although a majority of users did not prefer the tool, it made the level design process significantly easier, and that the tool impacted the subjects’ design process. This paper describes the study results and draws lessons for mixed-initiative PCG tool design.

[1]  Antonios Liapis,et al.  Mixed-Initiative Creative Interfaces , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  A. Joshi,et al.  Likert Scale: Explored and Explained , 2015 .

[3]  Nathan R. Sturtevant,et al.  Exhaustive and Semi-Exhaustive Procedural Content Generation , 2018, AIIDE.

[4]  Julian Togelius,et al.  Procedural Content Generation via Machine Learning (PCGML) , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Games.

[5]  Matthew Guzdial,et al.  Co-Creative Level Design via Machine Learning , 2018, AIIDE Workshops.

[6]  Michael Mateas,et al.  Tanagra: a mixed-initiative level design tool , 2010, FDG.

[7]  Vishwa Shah,et al.  Friend, Collaborator, Student, Manager: How Design of an AI-Driven Game Level Editor Affects Creators , 2019, CHI.

[8]  María R. Sierra,et al.  Exhaustive Search of Priority Rules for On-Line Scheduling , 2020, ECAI.

[9]  Julian Togelius,et al.  Sentient Sketchbook: Computer-aided game level authoring , 2013, FDG.

[10]  Julian Togelius,et al.  The search-based approach , 2016 .

[11]  Gennaro Campos,et al.  Mixed-Initiative tool to speed Up content creation in physics-based games , 2017 .

[12]  Antonios Liapis,et al.  Mixed-initiative content creation , 2016 .

[13]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  Procedural content generation for games: A survey , 2013, TOMCCAP.

[14]  Matthew Guzdial,et al.  A General Level Design Editor for Co-Creative Level Design , 2017, AIIDE Workshops.

[15]  Nathan R. Sturtevant,et al.  The Unexpected Consequence of Incremental Design Changes , 2020, AAAI 2020.

[16]  Andrew Hoyt,et al.  Integrating Automated Play in Level Co-Creation , 2019, ArXiv.

[17]  Zoran Popovic,et al.  A mixed-initiative tool for designing level progressions in games , 2013, UIST.

[18]  J. Togelius,et al.  Baba is Y’all: Collaborative Mixed-Initiative Level Design , 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG).

[19]  Nathan R. Sturtevant,et al.  A Demonstration of Anhinga: A Mixed-Initiative EPCG Tool for Snakebird , 2020, AAAI 2020.

[20]  Michael Mateas,et al.  Casual Creators , 2015, ICCC.