Number sense in the transition from natural to rational numbers

BACKGROUND Rational numbers are of critical importance both in mathematics and in other fields of science. However, they form a stumbling block for learners. One widely known source of the difficulty learners have with rational numbers is the natural number bias, that is the tendency to (inappropriately) apply natural number properties in rational number tasks. Still, it has been shown that a good understanding of natural numbers is highly predictive for mathematics achievement in general, and for performance on rational number tasks in particular. AIMS In this study, we further investigated the relation between learners' natural and rational number knowledge, specifically in cases where a natural number bias may lead to errors. SAMPLE Participants were 140 sixth graders from six different primary schools. METHOD Participants completed a symbolic and a non-symbolic natural number comparison task, a number line estimation task, and a rational number sense test. RESULTS Learners' natural number knowledge was found to be a good predictor of their rational number knowledge. However, after first controlling for learners' general mathematics achievement, their natural number knowledge only predicted the subaspect of operations with rational numbers. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that the relation between learners' natural and rational number knowledge can largely be explained by their relation with learners' general mathematics achievement.

[1]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[2]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[4]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing the magnitude of two fractions with common components: which representations are used by 10- and 12-year-olds? , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Naturally Biased? In Search for Reaction Time Evidence for a Natural Number Bias in Adults. , 2012 .

[7]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Searching for a whole number bias in secondary school students - a reaction time study on fraction comparison , 2012 .

[8]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Parts and 'holes': gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. , 2008, Developmental science.

[9]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Susan Carey,et al.  Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: a conceptual change approach , 2004 .

[12]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. , 2008, Child development.

[13]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systemic model of the processes of change , 2004 .

[14]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science , 2001 .

[15]  Song A. An,et al.  Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: the case of fraction division , 2009 .

[16]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[17]  Elida V. Laski,et al.  Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. , 2007, Child development.

[18]  Wim Van Dooren,et al.  What Fills the Gap between Discrete and Dense? Greek and Flemish Students' Understanding of Density. , 2011 .

[19]  Robert S Siegler,et al.  Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. , 2014, Developmental science.

[20]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Rational Numbers and Intensive Quantities: Challenges and Insights to Pupils´ Implicit Knowledge , 2008 .

[21]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Inappropriately applying natural number properties in rational number tasks: characterizing the development of the natural number bias through primary and secondary education , 2015 .

[22]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  How Many Decimals Are There Between Two Fractions? Aspects of Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Rational Numbers and Their Notation , 2010 .

[23]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  NUMBER COMPARISON AND NUMBER LINE ESTIMATION RELY ON DIFFERENT MECHANISMS , 2013 .

[24]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Parallel development of ERP and behavioural measurements of visual segmentation. , 2014, Developmental science.

[26]  Gavin R. Price,et al.  Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1-6. , 2014, Developmental science.

[27]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks , 2013 .

[28]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students' interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations , 2015 .

[30]  P. Onghena,et al.  The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5- to 9-year old children: evidence for a segmented linear model. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Inhibiting natural knowledge in fourth graders: towards a comprehensive test instrument , 2015 .

[32]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[33]  L. Resnick,et al.  Conceptual Bases of Arithmetic Errors: The Case of Decimal Fractions. , 1989 .

[34]  Lisa K Fazio,et al.  Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.