Letter position coding in attentional dyslexia

We report data from experiments on orthographic and phonological coding in two patients with attentional dyslexia following bilateral parietal damage. Two experiments required the patients to carry out lexical decisions and we varied whether the nonwords were orthographically or phonologically similar to real words. Experiment 1 showed that the patients were sensitive to the orthographic relations between nonwords and words, as they tended to accept as words nonwords whose letters could migrate within the string to form a word. There were no effects of phonological similarity between the nonwords and the words. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the patients were less likely to accept nonwords as words if the word had to be formed by transposing the first two letters in the string. The data suggest that attentional dyslexics are primarily sensitive to orthographic similarity between words and nonwords, and also that the first letters have privileged coding of their locations, despite the patients being poor at coding letter positions. The implications for theories of visual word recognition are discussed.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[2]  G W Humphreys,et al.  A peripheral reading deficit under conditions of diffuse visual attention , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[5]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Anagram solution times: a function of multiple-solution anagrams. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Serial, parallel, or holistic identification of single words in the two visual fields? , 1977 .

[7]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Presentation and task effects on migration errors in attentional dyslexia , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence for Case-Specific Reading: Multi-Letter Units in Visual Word Recognition , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation , 2006 .

[10]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Jane Riddoch,et al.  Loss of visual imagery : a generation deficit , 1990 .

[12]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  Ewa Wojciulik Nancy Kanwisher Implicit but not Explicit Feature Binding in a Balint's Patient , 1998 .

[14]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Letter Position Dyslexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  V. Coltheart Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Attentional dyslexia: The effect of co-occurring deficits , 1993 .

[17]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Memories are made of this: the effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  A case of integrative visual agnosia. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  P. Merikle,et al.  Selective forward masking. , 1972, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in simultanagnosia: Coarse coding of visual feature location? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[25]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies , 1992 .

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  On the relations between implicit and explicit spatial binding: Evidence from Balint’s syndrome , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[27]  A. Young,et al.  “Neglect dyslexia” and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords , 1987 .

[28]  J Grainger,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Mozer Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  L Cipolotti,et al.  Spared written naming of proper nouns: a case report. , 1993, Memory.

[31]  Eleanor M. Saffran,et al.  "Attentional Dyslexia" in Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Study , 1996 .

[32]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reading of letters and words in a patient with Balint's syndrome , 1994, Neuropsychologia.