A quantitative model for mRNA translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Messenger RNA (mRNA) translation is an essential step in eukaryotic gene expression that contributes to the regulation of this process. We describe a deterministic model based on ordinary differential equations that describe mRNA translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This model, which was parameterized using published data, was developed to examine the kinetic behaviour of translation initiation factors in response to amino acid availability. The model predicts that the abundance of the eIF1–eIF3–eIF5 complex increases under amino acid starvation conditions, suggesting a possible auxiliary role for these factors in modulating translation initiation in addition to the known mechanisms involving eIF2. Our analyses of the robustness of the mRNA translation model suggest that individual cells within a randomly generated population are sensitive to external perturbations (such as changes in amino acid availability) through Gcn2 signalling. However, the model predicts that individual cells exhibit robustness against internal perturbations (such as changes in the abundance of translation initiation factors and kinetic parameters). Gcn2 appears to enhance this robustness within the system. These findings suggest a trade‐off between the robustness and performance of this biological network. The model also predicts that individual cells exhibit considerable heterogeneity with respect to their absolute translation rates, due to random internal perturbations. Therefore, averaging the kinetic behaviour of cell populations probably obscures the dynamic robustness of individual cells. This highlights the importance of single‐cell measurements for evaluating network properties. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  H. Lodish,et al.  A kinetic model of protein synthesis. Application to hemoglobin synthesis and translational control. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  T. Godefroy-Colburn,et al.  The role of mRNA competition in regulating translation. IV. Kinetic model. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  C. Harley,et al.  Model for messenger RNA translation during amino acid starvation applied to the calculation of protein synthetic error rates. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  R. Panniers,et al.  The catalytic mechanism of guanine nucleotide exchange factor action and competitive inhibition by phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  M. Comanducci,et al.  The structure of a plasmid of Chlamydia trachomatis believed to be required for growth within mammalian cells , 1988, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  A. Wahba,et al.  Mechanism of the nucleotide exchange reaction in eukaryotic polypeptide chain initiation. Characterization of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor as a GTP-binding protein. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Gene Expression , 1993, Progress in Gene Expression.

[8]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Requirements for intercistronic distance and level of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 activity in reinitiation on GCN4 mRNA vary with the downstream cistron , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  F. Messenguy,et al.  A segment of mRNA encoding the leader peptide of the CPA1 gene confers repression by arginine on a heterologous yeast gene transcript , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[10]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[11]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[12]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[13]  C. Rodrigues-Pousada,et al.  The yeast transcription factor genes YAP1 and YAP2 are subject to differential control at the levels of both translation and mRNA stability. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  A multifactor complex of eukaryotic initiation factors, eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, eIF5, and initiator tRNA(Met) is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. , 2000, Genes & development.

[15]  K. Manchester Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on eIF2 by eIF2B: can it be both a substituted enzyme and a sequential mechanism? , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[16]  Ñ.,et al.  Mechanism of the Nucleotide Exchange Reaction in Eukaryotic Polypeptide Chain Initiation , 2001 .

[17]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Intracellular translation initiation factor levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in cap‐complex function , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  Mikkel A. Algire,et al.  Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system. , 2002, RNA.

[19]  J. Hughes,et al.  Translation initiation and surface plasmon resonance: new technology applied to old questions. , 2002, Biochemical Society transactions.

[20]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[21]  C. Wittmann,et al.  Free intracellular amino acid pools during autonomous oscillations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Translational control by TOR and TAP42 through dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha kinase GCN2. , 2003, Genes & development.

[24]  J. Lorsch,et al.  Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 1 and 1A on the yeast small ribosomal subunit. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Gene Expression Analyzed by High-resolution State Array Analysis and Quantitative Proteomics , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  Jon R Lorsch,et al.  The molecular mechanics of eukaryotic translation. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Interactions of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 (eIF3) Subunit NIP1/c with eIF1 and eIF5 Promote Preinitiation Complex Assembly and Regulate Start Codon Selection , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  Yasufumi Yamamoto,et al.  Physical Association of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor (eIF) 5 Carboxyl-terminal Domain with the Lysine-rich eIF2β Segment Strongly Enhances Its Binding to eIF3* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  G. Wagner,et al.  Translation initiation: structures, mechanisms and evolution , 2004, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[30]  Xin Yao,et al.  Search biases in constrained evolutionary optimization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[31]  J. Lorsch,et al.  A conformational change in the eukaryotic translation preinitiation complex and release of eIF1 signal recognition of the start codon. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[32]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  N. Hoyle,et al.  Dynamic cycling of eIF2 through a large eIF2B-containing cytoplasmic body , 2005, Journal of Cell Biology.

[34]  M. Bovee,et al.  A substrate-assisted concerted mechanism for aminoacylation by a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[35]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[36]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Models of stochastic gene expression , 2005 .

[37]  A. Hinnebusch Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.

[38]  C. Francklyn,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of a functionally important backbone phosphate group critical for aminoacylation of histidine tRNAs. , 2006, RNA.

[39]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[40]  Yasufumi Yamamoto,et al.  An eIF5/eIF2 complex antagonizes guanine nucleotide exchange by eIF2B during translation initiation , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[41]  M. Hall,et al.  TOR Signaling in Growth and Metabolism , 2006, Cell.

[42]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 (eIF3) and eIF2 Can Promote mRNA Binding to 40S Subunits Independently of eIF4G in Yeast , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[43]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[44]  J. Lorsch,et al.  Interaction between Eukaryotic Initiation Factors 1A and 5B Is Required for Efficient Ribosomal Subunit Joining* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Nadav Skjøndal-Bara,et al.  Dynamic Model of the Process of Protein Synthesis in Eukaryotic Cells , 2007 .

[46]  J. Stelling,et al.  Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[47]  G. Coghill,et al.  A quantitative model for the translational control of GCN4 in yeast , 2007 .

[48]  Mikkel A. Algire,et al.  The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[49]  Mikkel A. Algire,et al.  Dissociation of eIF1 from the 40S ribosomal subunit is a key step in start codon selection in vivo. , 2007, Genes & development.

[50]  Padchanee Sangthong,et al.  Distributed control for recruitment, scanning and subunit joining steps of translation initiation , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  Tao You,et al.  A quantitative model for the GCN4 translational control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[52]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  M. Sachs,et al.  Translation factor control of ribosome conformation during start codon selection. , 2007, Genes & development.

[54]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[55]  Andreas Beyer,et al.  Posttranscriptional Expression Regulation: What Determines Translation Rates? , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  Tsuyoshi Udagawa,et al.  Change in nutritional status modulates the abundance of critical pre-initiation intermediate complexes during translation initiation in vivo. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Richard J. Dimelow,et al.  Control of translation initiation: a model-based analysis from limited experimental data , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[58]  R. E. Luna,et al.  Eukaryotic Initiation Factor (eIF) 1 Carries Two Distinct eIF5-binding Faces Important for Multifactor Assembly and AUG Selection* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.