Using intranet-based order sets to standardize clinical care and prepare for computerized physician order entry.

BACKGROUND The high cost of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and physician resistance to standardized care have delayed implementation. An intranet-based order set system can provide some of CPOE's benefits and offer opportunities to acculturate physicians toward standardized care. INTRANET CLINICIAN ORDER FORMS (COF): The COF system at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) allows caregivers to enter and print orders through the intranet at points of care and to access decision support resources. RESULTS Work on COF began in March 2000 with transfer of 25 MUSC paper-based order set forms to an intranet site. Physician groups developed additional order sets, which number more than 200. Web traffic increased progressively during a 24-month period, peaking at more than 6,400 hits per month to COF. Decision support tools improved compliance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services core indicators. DISCUSSION Clinicians demonstrated a willingness to develop and use order sets and decision support tools posted on the COF site. COF provides a low-cost method for preparing caregivers and institutions to adopt CPOE and standardization of care. The educational resources, relevant links to external resources, and communication alerts will all link to CPOE, thereby providing a head start in CPOE implementation.

[1]  R. Raschke,et al.  A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[3]  T. Clemmer,et al.  A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Physician order entry in U.S. hospitals , 1998, AMIA.

[6]  G. Kuperman,et al.  Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[8]  William W. Stead,et al.  Review: Computer-based Physician Order Entry: The State of the Art , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  David M. Schuster,et al.  Implementation Brief: Involving Users in the Implementation of an Imaging Order Entry System , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Embedding guidelines into direct physician order entry: simple methods, powerful results , 1999, AMIA.

[11]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  D A Giuse,et al.  Provider Order Entry with Integrated Decision Support: from Academia to Industry , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[13]  Patrick J Antonelli,et al.  Computerized physician-order entry: are we there yet? , 2002, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[14]  Hagop S. Mekhjian,et al.  Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. , 2002, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Computerized physician order entry systems in hospitals: mandates and incentives. , 2002, Health affairs.

[16]  G. Schiff,et al.  Computerized prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. , 1998, JAMA.