The professionalization of campaigns in recent democracies: The Portuguese case

The fact that political campaigns in contemporary western democracies are fully professionalized seems to be unchallenged. Yet, the empirical evidence concerns few advanced democracies and mainly the main governing parties. We know little about the characteristics of political campaigns in recent democracies, as well as their main features in terms of political communication. This article aims to tackle these issues by examining the Portuguese case, a recent democracy characterized by relatively weak parties, television-centred communication and low levels of partisanship. In order to explore the features of political campaigns, this article draws on original data from both party elite interviews and a candidate survey for the 2009 legislative elections. The results show a relatively low degree of professionalization, especially in terms of marketing outlook. Overall, the findings provide support for hybrid models of campaign communication and suggest that political and institutional factors have important effects for party organization and communication tools.

[1]  P. Norris,et al.  Campaign Strategies and Tactics , 1996 .

[2]  Margaret Scammell,et al.  The wisdom of the war room: US campaigning and Americanization , 1998 .

[3]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[4]  B. Newman.  Handbook of political marketing , 1999 .

[5]  D. Lilleker,et al.  The Professionalization of Political Communication , 2002 .

[6]  R. Negrine.  The Professionalisation of Political Communication , 2007 .

[7]  Andrea Römmele,et al.  Measuring the Professionalization of Political Campaigning , 2009 .

[8]  P. Mancini,et al.  Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences , 1996 .

[9]  Stylianos Papathanassopoulos,et al.  The “Americanization” of Political Communication , 1996 .

[10]  Margaret Scammell,et al.  Political Marketing: Lessons for Political Science , 1999 .

[11]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning , 2001 .

[12]  David M. Farrell,et al.  Parties and Campaign Professionals in a Digital Age , 2001 .

[13]  D. Farrell,et al.  Electoral strategies and political marketing , 1992 .

[14]  S. Blumenthal.  The permanent campaign , 1980 .

[15]  P. Pennings.  Political Parties in New Democracies. Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe , 2004 .

[16]  P. Mancini.  New Frontiers in Political Professionalism , 1999 .

[17]  Marco Lisi.  Ao serviço do líder: as campanhas eleitorais do Partido Socialista** , 2008 .

[18]  D. Farrell,et al.  Campaign Modernization and the West European Party , 2002 .

[19]  J. Lapalombara,et al.  Political Parties: Organization and Power , 1988 .

[20]  J. Strömbäck.  Selective Professionalisation of Political Campaigning: A Test of the Party-Centred Theory of Professionalised Campaigning in the Context of the 2006 Swedish Election , 2009 .

[21]  P. Schmitter.  Portugal : do autoritarismo à democracia , 1999 .

[22]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[23]  J. Fisher,et al.  Professionalism and the Millbank Tendency: The Political Sociology of New Labour's Employees , 2003 .

[24]  Diogo Moreira.  Esquerda e direita na política europeia: Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada , 2009 .

[25]  S. Coleman.  Political Marketing: a Comparative Perspective , 2007 .

[26]  Thomas Poguntke,et al.  The Presidentialization of Politics , 2005 .

[27]  Jesper Strömbäck PhD in journalism.  Political Marketing and Professionalized Campaigning: A Conceptual Analysis , 2008 .