Magnetic resonance imaging protocol optimization for delineation of gross tumor volume in hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors.

PURPOSE To optimize the use of MRI for delineation of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes in hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS Magnetic resonance images (T1 weighted and T2 weighted) of a healthy volunteer were acquired using a 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR scanner. Various receiver coils were investigated that were compatible with the immobilization mask needed for reliable coregistration with computed tomography data. For the optimal receiver coil, the influence of resolution, slice thickness, and strength of magnetic field on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was studied. Feasibility of the definitive protocol was tested on patients with hypopharyngeal (n = 19) and laryngeal (n = 42) carcinoma. RESULTS Large differences in SNR were obtained for the various coils. The SNR values obtained using surface coils that were compatible with the immobilization mask were three times higher than those obtained using a standard head-and-neck coil and five times higher than those obtained using a body coil. High-resolution images (0.4 x 0.4 x 4 mm(3)) showed superior anatomic detail and resulted in a 4-min scan time. Image quality at 3.0 T was not significantly better compared with 1.5 T. In 3 patients the MR study could not be performed; for 5 patients images were severely deteriorated by motion artefacts. High-quality MR images were obtained in 53 patients. CONCLUSIONS High-resolution MR images of the hypopharynx and larynx can be obtained in the majority of patients using surface receiver coils in combination with the radiotherapy mask. These MR images can be successfully used for tumor delineation in radiotherapy.

[1]  K. Soila,et al.  MRI assisted treatment planning for radiation therapy of the head and neck. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  M. Sprenger,et al.  Invasion of laryngeal cartilage by cancer: comparison of CT and MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[4]  P. Dulguerov,et al.  Neoplastic invasion of laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at MR imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[5]  J. Castelijns,et al.  Imaging of the larynx. , 2000, Seminars in roentgenology.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Regina O Redfern,et al.  Intraobserver variability in the MR determination of tumor volume in squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  A. Riegel,et al.  Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Knol,et al.  Pre- and post-radiotherapy MRI results as a predictive model for response in laryngeal carcinoma , 2008, European Radiology.

[10]  F. De Keyzer,et al.  Evaluation of the larynx for tumour recurrence by diffusion-weighted MRI after radiotherapy: initial experience in four cases. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  J. Sénac,et al.  CT and MR evaluation of laryngeal carcinomas. , 1993, The Journal of otolaryngology.