Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes

On theoretical, methodological, and practical grounds, this paper argues the case for conducting processual studies of organizational change. Such process studies may be conducted through a research approach which is not only longitudinal but also seeks to analyze processes in their intra-organizational and social, economic, political and business context. This paper outlines some of the epistemological and craft features of contextualist research and ends by posing questions about the evaluation of research conducted in a contextualist manner. Contrary to the way the practice of research is often taught and written up, the activity of research is clearly a social process and not merely a rationally contrived act. Furthermore it is a social process descriptively more easily characterized in the language of muddling through, incrementalism, and political process than it is as rational, foresightful, goal directed activity. Indeed it seems naive and two-faced of us to recognize, on the one hand, the now familiar notions that problem solving and decision making processes in organizations have elements of political process (Pettigrew 1973a), incrementalism

[1]  W. Beveridge The Art Of Scientific Investigation , 1957 .

[2]  R. Lippitt,et al.  The dynamics of planned change , 1958 .

[3]  D. G. Bowers OD Techniques and Their Results in 23 Organizations: The Michigan ICL Study , 1973 .

[4]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Occupational Specialization as an Emergent Process , 1973 .

[5]  A. Pettigrew The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[6]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[7]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[8]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Intervention Theory and Method. , 1974 .

[9]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew Strategic Aspects of the Management of Specialist Activity , 1975 .

[11]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Implementing strategic decisions , 1975 .

[12]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[13]  David J. Hickson,et al.  Organizational structure in its context : the Aston programme 1 , 1976 .

[14]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[15]  J. L. Franklin Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Organization Development , 1976 .

[16]  Lisl Klein,et al.  A social scientist in industry , 1976 .

[17]  Harvie Ramsay,et al.  Cycles of Control: Worker Participation in Sociological and Historical Perspective , 1977 .

[18]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[19]  Liz Spencer,et al.  Integration and Regulation in Organizations: A Contextual Approach , 1979 .

[20]  Per Olof Berg Emotional structures in organizations : a study of the process of change in a Swedish company , 1979 .

[21]  A. Pettigrew On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[22]  A Blankholm,et al.  [Organizational development]. , 1979, Sykepleien.

[23]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[24]  L. Smircich,et al.  The Case for Qualitative Research , 1980 .

[25]  S. Ranson The Structuring of Organizational Structures. , 1980 .

[26]  J. McCann Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[27]  J. Goldstone The Weakness of Organization: A New Look at Gamson's The Strategy of Social Protest , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  W. Gamson Understanding the Careers of Challenging Groups: A Commentary on Goldstone , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Coffin nails and corporate strategies , 1982 .

[30]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[31]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[32]  CHARACTERISTICS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT , .