Estimation of genetic and environmental risk factors associated with pre-weaning mortality in piglets using generalized linear mixed models.

Risk factors and variance components of pre-weaning mortality were estimated using generalized linear mixed models. Data were from 12 727 piglets born alive from 1338 litters recorded at the pig breeding farm of the University of Kiel from 1989 to 1994. Deviances due to risk factors were estimated by generalized linear model and their odds-ratios by generalized linear mixed model both with binomial errors and a logistic link. Variance components of sire, dam and litter were estimated using a logit or probit link function as well as a linear model for which estimates were transformed to the underlying continuous scale. Highest increase in deviance, indicating the risk factor, which accounts for the greatest amount of unexplained variation of pre-weaning mortality was obtained after exclusion of individual birth weight (1206) from the model, followed by year-season (217), parity-farrowing age or interval (58), genotype of piglets (56), sex (39), total number of piglets born (18) and gestation length (16). Substitution of individual birth weight successively by average piglet birth weight per litter, litter birth weight and standard deviation of birth weight within litter resulted in models with substantially lower explained variation of pre-weaning mortality. Odds of pre-weaning mortality was 1·5 times higher for males than for females and 2·0 times higher in piglets from German Landrace dams than from Large White dams. Odds increased to the fifth parity by 2·2 times the odds of the first parity or increased for the age group of dams between 850 and 949 days by 2·3 times the odds of the age group with less than 350 days. When the continuous risk factors of individual birth weight, average piglet birth weight and litter birth weight decreased or standard deviation of birth weight within litter increased by one standard deviation from the mean, the odds ratios increased by 6·0, 1·6, 0·8 and 0·4, respectively. Piglets with individual birth weights of 1·8, 1·5, 1·2 and 1·0 kg showed a rapid increase in odds ratios of pre-weaning mortality of 1·4, 2·7, 7·0 and 16·1, respectively, relative to piglets with 2·1 kg. Estimates of direct heritability for pre-weaning mortality on the linear observed, transformed underlying, logit and probit scale were 0·02, 0·06, 0·07 and 0·07, respectively. Low estimates of heritability for pre-weaning mortality, even on the underlying continuous scale, suggested low potential for improvement by selection. Therefore, selection for individual birth weight phenotypically closely associated with pre-weaning mortality was recommended to improve survival of piglets during the nursing period.

[1]  F. Dunshea,et al.  The influence of piglet body weight on milk production of sows , 1997 .

[2]  G. A. Lodge,et al.  BODY COMPOSITION AND GLYCOGEN RESERVES IN THE NEONATAL PIG DURING THE FIRST 96 HOURS POSTPARTUM , 1977 .

[3]  D. Collett Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[4]  A. Robertson,et al.  The Heritability of All-or-None Traits: Viability of Poultry. , 1949, Genetics.

[5]  H. Steen,et al.  Direct and maternal breed effects on growth and milk intake of piglets: Meishan versus Dutch breeds. , 1992 .

[6]  W. Buist,et al.  Analysis of a Generalized Linear Mixed Model: A Case Study and Simulation Results , 1996 .

[7]  T. Lende,et al.  Death risk and preweaning growth rate of piglets in relation to the within-litter weight distribution at birth. , 1991 .

[8]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Individual animal model estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits of landrace pigs performance tested in a commercial nucleus herd , 1997 .

[9]  H. Klemcke,et al.  Association between low birth weight and increased adrenocortical function in neonatal pigs. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[10]  C. Haley,et al.  Comparative farrowing to weaning performance in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses. , 1995 .

[11]  R. Roehe,et al.  Effect of selection for maternal and direct genetic effects on genetic improvement of litter size in swine. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[12]  H. C. Stanton,et al.  Potential mechanisms responsible for prenatal and perinatal mortality or low viability of swine. , 1974, Journal of animal science.

[13]  A. D. Vries,et al.  A model to estimate economic values of traits in pig breeding. , 1989 .

[14]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Effect of ignoring random sire and dam effects on estimates and standard errors of breed comparisons. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[15]  R. Roehe Genetic determination of individual birth weight and its association with sow productivity traits using Bayesian analyses. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[16]  P. Herpin,et al.  Effect of selection for lean tissue growth on body composition and physiological state of the pig at birth. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[17]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  Relationships between age at puberty and interval from weaning to estrus and between estrus signs at puberty and after the first weaning in pigs. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[18]  D. Fraser The role of behavior in swine production: A review of research , 1984 .

[19]  E. Tholen,et al.  The genetic foundation of fitness and reproduction traits in Australian pig populations. 2. Relationships between weaning to conception interval, farrowing interval, stayability, and other common reproduction and production traits. , 1996 .

[20]  R. Huirne,et al.  Evaluation of optimal age at first conception in gilts from data collected in commercial swine herds. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[21]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Genetics of the interval from weaning to estrus in first-litter sows: correlated responses. , 1998, Journal of Animal Science.

[22]  S. Hoy,et al.  [The effect of birth weight on the early postnatal vitality of piglets]. , 1994, DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[23]  B. Bereskin,et al.  Some factors affecting pig survival. , 1973, Journal of Animal Science.

[24]  J. E. Moxley,et al.  Evaluation of piglet mortality in 28 two-breed crosses among eight breeds of pig , 1978 .

[25]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock , 1990, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences.

[26]  J. Rushen,et al.  Performance of young pigs: relationships with periparturient progesterone, prolactin, and insulin of sows. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[27]  J. Caritez,et al.  Estimation of crossbreeding parameters between Large White and Meishan porcine breeds. III. Dominance and epistatic components of heterosis on reproductive traits , 1993, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[28]  R. Hacker,et al.  Variables related to the progress of parturition and probability of stillbirth in swine. , 1993, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[29]  Kjell Arne Johansson,et al.  Prediction of breeding values and dominance effects from mixed models with approximations of the dominance relationship matrix , 1993 .

[30]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  A genetic study of pubertal age, litter traits, weight loss during lactation and relations to growth and leanness in gilts , 1992 .

[31]  Jean-Yves Dourmad,et al.  EFFECT OF AGE AT FIRST FARROWING AND HERD MANAGEMENT ON LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY OF SOWS , 1998 .

[32]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Generalized Linear Models and Applications to Animal Breeding , 1990 .

[33]  E. Knol,et al.  Estimation of direct and maternal genetic (co) variances for survival within litters of piglets , 1996 .

[34]  C. Haley,et al.  Selection for litter size in the pig. , 1988 .

[35]  B. Engel,et al.  Maximizing selection efficiency for categorical traits. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[36]  Reproductive performance of pigs selected for components of efficient lean growth , 1995 .