Organizational Routines as Mechanisms for Knowledge Creation, Utilization, and Storage

Organizational routines can be viewed as mechanisms for knowledge creation, utilization, and storage. Many routines, by their very nature, become buried in the daily work of an organization. In time, organization members become less conscious of many routines and these routines subsequently become more difficult to manage. This difficulty reduces the likelihood, in some cases, that the knowledge benefits originating from routines will be effectively appropriated by the organization. This paper describes the nature of organizational routines and describes some ways in which they can be managed for positive organizational benefit.

[1]  William David Salisbury,et al.  Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[3]  R. Burt Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[4]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  Strategic Organizational Change: Exploring the Roles of Environmental Structure, Internal Conscious Awareness and Knowledge , 2003 .

[5]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Eelke M. Heemskerk,et al.  Brokerage & Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital , 2007 .

[7]  G. Hoetker,et al.  DEATH HURTS, BUT IT ISN'T FATAL: THE POSTEXIT DIFFUSION OF KNOWLEDGE CREATED BY INNOVATIVE COMPANIES. , 2005 .

[8]  Greg Laugero,et al.  Managing Knowledge , 1998 .

[9]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[10]  Michael B. Arthur,et al.  Knowledge at Work , 2006 .

[11]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Knowledge Creation in New Product Development Projects , 2006 .

[12]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  The Dynamic Value of Hierarchy , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[14]  Elayne Coakes,et al.  Managing and leveraging knowledge for organisational advantage , 2004 .

[15]  Werner Güth,et al.  Path dependence without denying deliberation— a continuous transition model connecting teleology and evolution , 2007 .

[16]  Richard Whittington,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURE AND THEORIES OF STRATEGIC CHOICE , 1988 .

[17]  C. Lévi-Strauss The Savage Mind , 1967 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[19]  Michael X Cohen Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections , 1991 .

[20]  William R. King The Critical Role of Information Processing in Creating an Effective Knowledge Organization , 2006, J. Database Manag..

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[22]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Momentum or Deceleration? Theoretical and Methodological Reflections on the Analysis of Organizational Change , 2008 .

[23]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[24]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The quality of group tacit knowledge , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[27]  L. Prusak Knowledge in organizations , 1997 .

[28]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[29]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Placing boxes on shelves: a case study , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  S Haughton Teleology and Evolution , 1871, British medical journal.

[31]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[32]  M. Sastry Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change , 1997 .

[33]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Daniel J. Power,et al.  Effects of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Perceived Performance: An Empirical Examination , 2007, Decision Support for Global Enterprises.

[35]  Stephen Gourlay,et al.  Towards conceptual clarity for ‘tacit knowledge’: a review of empirical studies , 2006 .

[36]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[37]  Gary A. Ballinger,et al.  Individual Reactions to Leadership Succession in Workgroups , 2007 .

[38]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[39]  Timo Saarinen,et al.  Procurement Strategies for Information Systems , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  J. Vromen,et al.  Routines, genes and program-based behavior , 2006 .

[41]  Johan Roos,et al.  Imitation of Knowledge : A Sociology of Knowledge Perspective , 1996 .

[42]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[43]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[44]  Tammy E. Beck,et al.  RADICAL CHANGE ACCIDENTALLY: THE EMERGENCE AND AMPLIFICATION OF SMALL CHANGE , 2007 .

[45]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[46]  Tsuyoshi Numagami,et al.  Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology , 1992 .

[47]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Making knowledge work: five principles for action-oriented knowledge management , 2006 .

[48]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .