On the use of bone and skin markers in kinematics research

Abstract In the study of human kinematics, the object is generally to assess the movement of bone segments rather than the combined movement of bone and soft tissue. Therefore, movement derived from bone-anchored measurement devices is usually measured in studies of cadaveric specimens and considered superior to skin-derived motion measurements in in vivo situations. However, this is not necessarily true in all circumstances, as there are many possible problems and sources of error also in invasive research. A review of the literature concerning invasive measurements and literature relating to similar measurements using non-invasive techniques shows that few methods for non-invasive kinematics research have been validated. The invasive techniques used are generally well documented, but there is, for these techniques, a marked tendency to avoid some anatomical regions and study conditions. The purpose of this article is to make a summary of those methods that have to date been used for invasive research and their non-invasive counterparts, and to discuss possibilities for future studies.

[1]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Three‐dimensional knee joint movements during a step‐up: Evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  V. Goel,et al.  In vivo kinematics of the cervical spine. Part I: Development of a roentgen stereophotogrammetric technique using metallic markers and assessment of its accuracy. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[3]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  An in-vivo study of normal wrist kinematics. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  Verification of Roentgenographic Landmarks in the Lumbar Spine , 1977 .

[5]  T J Koh,et al.  In vivo tracking of the human patella. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  H. Broman,et al.  Resonant frequency of a pin-accelerometer system mounted in bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. T. Bryant,et al.  Precision and accuracy of bone landmarks in characterizing hand and wrist position. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  P Herberts,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human shoulder--I. Elements. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  G Selvik,et al.  Mobility of the pubic symphysis. In vivo measurements with an electromechanic method and a roentgen stereophotogrammetric method. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S M Howell,et al.  The role of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles in glenohumeral kinematics of anterior should instability. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Ankle joint biomechanics. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  Flexion-extension rhythm in the lumbosacral spine. , 1994 .

[13]  L Ryd,et al.  Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[14]  A. S. Levens,et al.  Transverse rotation of the segments of the lower extremity in locomotion. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  H K Genant,et al.  Functional dynamics of the knee joint by ultrafast, cine-CT. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[16]  T Hansson,et al.  A method for the intravital measurement of interspinous kinematics. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  S Santavirta,et al.  Reliability of radiographical measurements of spondylolisthesis and extension-flexion radiographs of the lumbar spine. , 1994, European journal of radiology.

[18]  A E Engin,et al.  On the biomechanics of human hip complex in vivo--I. Kinematics for determination of the maximal voluntary hip complex sinus. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J A Sidles,et al.  Laxity of the normal glenohumeral joint: A quantitative in vivo assessment. , 1992, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  J. R. Close,et al.  The function of the subtalar joint. , 1967, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  S M Howell,et al.  Normal and abnormal mechanics of the glenohumeral joint in the horizontal plane. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Abnormal kinematics of the artificial knee. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of 10 Miller-Galante and five New Jersey LCS knees. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[24]  V K Goel,et al.  Experimental investigation of three-dimensional spine kinetics. Determination of optimal placement of markers. , 1991, Spine.

[25]  M. Panjabi,et al.  An Analysis of Errors in Kinematic Parameters Associated with in Vivo Functional Radiographs , 1992, Spine.

[26]  B Peterson,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human shoulder joint--II. The shoulder rhythm. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  J G Andrews,et al.  The in vivo kinematics of the rheumatoid wrist , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Arne Lundberg,et al.  The pattern of motion of the longitudinal arch of the foot , 1994 .

[29]  S. Gracovetsky,et al.  A Database for Estimating Normal Spinal Motion Derived From Noninvasive Measurements , 1995, Spine.

[30]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three‐Dimensional mechanical properties of the thoracolumbar junction , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  T D Brown,et al.  A miniature piezoelectric polymer transducer for in vitro measurement of the dynamic contact stress distribution. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Y Itai,et al.  MR study of normal joint function using a low field strength system. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.