Computer Science: The Third Pillar of Medical Education

In 2001, The Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) attributed substantial problems in the quality of American medicine to four domains: growing complexity of science and technology; the increase in chronic conditions; a poorly organized delivery system; and constraints on exploiting the revolution in information technology (IT). Although all of these domains have been improved by IT systems within the last decade, the U.S. health care systems has been slow to adopt these developments. We propose one way to combat such quality problems by incorporating a medicine-specific computer science (CS) curriculum as the third of Abraham Flexner’s pillars of medical education.

[1]  Paul R Dexter,et al.  Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[2]  K. Grumbach Primary care in the United States--the best of times, the worst of times. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Marilyn D. Paterno,et al.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients , 2005 .

[4]  Gordon Bell,et al.  Beyond the Data Deluge , 2009, Science.

[5]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  David M Eddy,et al.  Validation of the archimedes diabetes model. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[7]  T. Miloh,et al.  Improved Adherence and Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients by Using Text Messaging , 2009, Pediatrics.

[8]  William M. Tierney,et al.  Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[10]  Jonathan Cylus,et al.  Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues. , 2010, Health affairs.

[11]  Abraham Flexner,et al.  MEDICAL EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA. , 1910, Science.

[12]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[13]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Physicians’ Use of Email With Patients: Factors Influencing Electronic Communication and Adherence to Best Practices , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  J. Ali,et al.  Attrition of cognitive and trauma management skills after the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  Maulik S Joshi,et al.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[16]  Laurence J. Kotlikoff,et al.  Health Care Spending: What the Future Will Look Like , 2006 .

[17]  R. Satava,et al.  Future delivery of health care: Cybercare , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[18]  D. Nash,et al.  Factors Related to Physicians’ Adoption of Electronic Prescribing: Results From a National Survey , 2005, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[19]  M. Daly,et al.  Genetic variants at CD28, PRDM1, and CD2/CD58 are associated with rheumatoid arthritis risk , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[21]  G. Moore,et al.  Primary Care Medicine in Crisis: Toward Reconstruction and Renewal , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Extrapolating evidence of health information technology savings and costs , 2005 .

[23]  V. Franklin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text‐messaging system to support young people with diabetes , 2006, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.