Career and Commitment in the Context of Comprehensive School Reform

The present article takes up a paradox: that teachers' involvement in ambitious innovation or large-scale reform may supply rich opportunities for professional growth while also introducing the seeds of longer-term career disappointment. Case study investigations of reforming high schools in the US from 1991 to 2001 illuminate the relationship of teachers' participation in secondary school reform to their teaching commitment and career trajectories. Two of the three successive studies produced a dominant pattern of initial enthusiasm followed by growing disappointment. We draw on the combined data to examine teachers' propensity to remain engaged with innovation or reform, and the ways in which sustained involvement strengthens or weakens teachers' career commitment and satisfaction.

[1]  K. Wilhelm,et al.  Teacher Stress? An Analysis of Why Teachers Leave and Why They Stay , 2000 .

[2]  Patrick J. McQuillan,et al.  Reform and Resistance in Schools and Classrooms: An Ethnographic View of the Coalition of Essential Schools , 1996 .

[3]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Considerations of Content and the Circumstances of Secondary School Teaching , 1994 .

[4]  J. Little.  Contested Ground: The Basis of Teacher Leadership in Two Restructuring High Schools , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  M. Huberman.  The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers , 1989, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Margaret C. Lohman,et al.  Self-Initiated Learning Activities of Experienced Public School Teachers: Methods, sources, and relevant organizational influences , 2001 .

[7]  Lora Bartlett.  "No room. No pay. No time." : Teachers's work in a time of expanding roles: A contribution to overwork theory , 2002 .

[8]  Rochelle Gutiérrez,et al.  Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: understanding their influence on student advancement , 1996 .

[9]  J. Little,et al.  The Emotional Contours and Career Trajectories of (Disappointed) Reform Enthusiasts , 1996 .

[10]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Teachers--Transforming Their World and Their Work , 1984 .

[11]  S. Ball,et al.  Subject departments and the ‘implementation’ of National Curriculum policy: an overview of the issues , 1992 .

[12]  Leslie Santee Siskin.  Realms Of Knowledge: Academic Departments In Secondary Schools , 1994 .