Risk Reduction Strategies against Terrorist Acts in Urban Built Environments: Towards Sustainable and Human-Centred Challenges

Terrorist impacts have been increasing over time in many countries, being one of the most significant threats for the Built Environment (BE), intended as a network of open spaces (streets, squares) and facing buildings, and their users. Such risk is affected by a combination of strategic functions and crowd conditions. This work traces, for the first time, the state-of-the-art consolidated Risk Mitigation and Reduction Strategies (RMRSs). Solid RMRS regulatory frameworks from all over the world are collected. The results show how classification criteria distinguish them by attack targets and typologies, effectiveness over time/space, and physical implementation versus management-based deployment. Nevertheless, these criteria seem to be too fragmented, failing in pursuing RMRSs selection in a holistic outlook. Thus, a new classification adopting the BE composing elements (physical elements, layout, access/surveillance systems, safety/security management) as key-factors is provided. Features, dependencies and coordination among them are discussed in a sustainability-based perspective, by showing how the main challenges for RMRSs’ design concern applicability, redundancy, and users’ emergency support. Safety/security management strategies have the overall highest sustainability level and play a pivotal role with respect to the other BE composing elements, which should be planned in reference to them. In addition, a human-centred approach (individuals’ interactions with BEs and RMRSs) will also be needed. These results will support efforts to include simulation-oriented approaches into RMRSs selection, effectiveness and feasibility analyses.

[1]  Reda Alhajj,et al.  Human behavior modeling for simulating evacuation of buildings during emergencies , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[2]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Resilient and User-Centered Solutions for a Safer Built Environment Against Sudden and Slow Onset Disasters: The BE S2ECURe Project , 2021 .

[3]  P. Gill,et al.  Modelling the spatial decision making of terrorists: The discrete choice approach , 2019, Applied Geography.

[4]  Lukas Kralik,et al.  Soft Targets – Possibilities of Their Identification , 2018 .

[5]  Ove Njå,et al.  Police officers' learning in relation to emergency management: A case study , 2017 .

[6]  Qian Liu,et al.  A social force model for the crowd evacuation in a terrorist attack , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[7]  Changkun Chen,et al.  An extended model for describing pedestrian evacuation under the threat of artificial attack , 2018, Physics Letters A.

[8]  Daniel Alvear,et al.  On the use of stochastic simulations to explore the impact of human parameters on mass public shooting attacks , 2019 .

[9]  Qian Liu A social force approach for the defensive strategy of security guards in a terrorist attack , 2020 .

[10]  Jun Zhuang,et al.  A three-stage evacuation decision-making and behavior model for the onset of an attack , 2017 .

[11]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Terrorist critical infrastructures, organizational capacity and security risk , 2018, Safety Science.

[12]  Daniel Alvear,et al.  A new approach to protect soft-targets from terrorist attacks , 2019 .

[13]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Proposing behavior-oriented strategies for earthquake emergency evacuation: A behavioral data analysis from New Zealand, Italy and Japan , 2019, Safety Science.

[14]  Jon Coaffee,et al.  The Visibility of (In)security: The Aesthetics of Planning Urban Defences Against Terrorism , 2009 .

[15]  Ahmet Usakli,et al.  Terrorism prevention in tourism destinations: Security forces vs. civil authority perspectives , 2017, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management.

[16]  Robert D. Brown,et al.  Designing public open space to support seismic resilience: A systematic review , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[17]  Dawei Han,et al.  A hazard-human coupled model (HazardCM) to assess city dynamic exposure to rainfall-triggered natural hazards , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Vikas Agrawal,et al.  An agent-based simulation system for concert venue crowd evacuation modeling in the presence of a fire disaster , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  J. Drury,et al.  Predicting collective behaviour at the Hajj: place, space and the process of cooperation , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Fergus Neville,et al.  Modeling Collective Behaviour: Insights and Applications from Crowd Psychology , 2020 .

[21]  Ashish Verma,et al.  A review of studies on understanding crowd dynamics in the context of crowd safety in mass religious gatherings , 2017 .

[22]  Pavel Albores,et al.  Government preparedness: Using simulation to prepare for a terrorist attack , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Ben Bradford,et al.  Security and the smart city: A systematic review , 2020 .

[24]  D. Koren,et al.  The Potential of Open Space for Enhancing Urban Seismic Resilience: A literature Review , 2019, Sustainability.

[25]  Solomos George,et al.  Review on vehicle barrier protection guidance , 2017 .

[26]  Yong Seog Kim,et al.  Airport Emergency Evacuation Planning: An Agent-Based Simulation Study of Dirty Bomb Scenarios , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[27]  Anne Templeton,et al.  Placing Large Group Relations into Pedestrian Dynamics: Psychological Crowds in Counterflow , 2020, Collective Dynamics.

[28]  Jingang Li,et al.  Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and mechanism analysis of urban population density: A case of Xi'an, Shaanxi, China , 2019, Cities.

[29]  Jon Coaffee,et al.  Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience , 2015 .

[30]  S. Jore The Conceptual and Scientific Demarcation of Security in Contrast to Safety , 2019 .

[31]  A. Dobalian,et al.  Responding to risk: Awareness and action after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks , 2014 .

[32]  Hui Liu,et al.  Mapping knowledge structure and research trends of emergency evacuation studies , 2020 .

[33]  Z. R. Abaas,et al.  Toward liveable commercial streets: A case study of Al-Karada inner street in Baghdad , 2019, Heliyon.

[34]  Sebastian Festag,et al.  Counterproductive (safety and security) strategies: The hazards of ignoring human behaviour , 2017 .

[35]  Jian Wang,et al.  Risk-Field Based Modeling for Pedestrian Emergency Evacuation Combined with Alternative Route Strategy , 2017 .

[36]  Jing Lin,et al.  Human-building-emergency interactions and their impact on emergency response performance: A review of the state of the art , 2020 .

[37]  Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada,et al.  Terrorist Attack Assessment: Paris November 2015 and Brussels March 2016 , 2016 .

[38]  Shunjiang Ni,et al.  Empirical study of crowd dynamic in public gathering places during a terrorist attack event , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[39]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Resilient urban forms: A review of literature on streets and street networks , 2019, Building and Environment.

[40]  Jing Lin,et al.  How occupants respond to building emergencies: A systematic review of behavioral characteristics and behavioral theories , 2020 .

[41]  Louahdi Khoudour,et al.  Improving the resilience of metro vehicle and passengers for an effective emergency response to terrorist attacks , 2014 .

[42]  Theodore J. Gordon,et al.  Potential measures for the pre-detection of terrorism , 2017 .