Sustaining Learning Design and Pedagogical Planning in CSCL

This paper tackles the issue of learning design and pedagogical planning in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). In this sector, we witness the same variety of approaches and tools that we find in the technology-enhanced learning (TEL) research field. In particular, in the CSCL context, notions such as “Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns” (CLFP) or “collaborative scripts” have been used to describe and/or run online collaborative learning activities and, consequently, tools have been implemented to reify these concepts and visualise the designs. Despite the differences, most of the existing tools support the representation of learning designs that are already “in the designer’s mind”, while fewer tools specifically aim to provide guidance and support to CSCL designers in the early phases of the design process, that is, when they have to make critical decisions concerning the educational approach, the tools to be used, and the ways to engage the target population. This paper, while focusing on this gap in CSCL research, proposes a unifying model, aimed at supporting pedagogical planning and decision making in the CSCL design process based on the interplay of four model components: Task, Teams, Time and Technology. Keywords: computer-supported collaborative learning; design process; 4Ts model; learning design (Published: 16 September 2013) Citation: Research in Learning Technology Supplement 2013, 21 : 17585 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17585

[1]  Jim Hewitt.  Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2005 .

[2]  Rob Koper,et al.  Current Research in Learning Design , 2006 .

[3]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[4]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[5]  Paul D. Rudman,et al.  Designing for learning in an open world , 2013 .

[6]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[8]  Leanne Cameron.  How learning design can illuminate teaching practice , 2009 .

[9]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Structuring online collaboration through 3TS: Task, Time and Teams , 2011 .

[10]  Thomas Ryberg,et al.  Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 , 2010 .

[11]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Techniques for Fostering Collaboration in Online Learning Communities: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , 2010 .

[13]  T. Anderson,et al.  Using Constructivism in Technology-Mediated Learning: Constructing Order out of the Chaos in the Literature , 1999 .

[14]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Cooperation scripts for learning via web-based discussion boards and videoconferencing , 2004 .

[15]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing for Learning in an Open World , 2012 .

[16]  Jean-Philippe Pernin,et al.  Models for the re-use of learning scenarios , 2006 .

[17]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[18]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design , 1991 .

[19]  Charles R. Beck.  Strategies for cueing visual information: research findings and instructional design implications , 1991 .

[20]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Structuring CSCL Through Collaborative Techniques and Scripts , 2011, Int. J. Online Pedagog. Course Des..

[21]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  An overview of design representations , 2010 .

[22]  Luigi Sarti,et al.  Monitoring collaborative activities in computer supported collaborative learning , 2010 .

[23]  Martin Wessner,et al.  Group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2001, GROUP.

[24]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[26]  Tia G. B. Hansen,et al.  Collaborative Learning : Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[27]  Iván M. Jorrín-Abellán,et al.  Reusing IMS LD formalized best practices in collaborative learning structuring , 2005 .

[28]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Designing Integrative Scripts , 2007 .

[29]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Miky Ronen,et al.  Adopt & Adapt: Structuring, Sharing and Reusing Asynchronous Collaborative Pedagogy , 2006, ICLS.

[31]  Mauro Tavella,et al.  Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Ervin L. Harlacher,et al.  Building Learning Communities , 1992 .

[33]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Scripted vs. free CS collaboration: alternatives and paths for adaptable and flexible CS scripted collaboration , 2009, CSCL.

[34]  J. Cross.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace , 2004 .

[35]  Philip Bell,et al.  Promoting Students' Argument Construction and Collaborative Debate in the Science Classroom , 2013 .

[36]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..