Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives.

Abstract In two experimental studies, we investigated the effects of public perceptions of climate scientists’ communicative motives on trust in scientists and willingness to engage with climate science messages. Study 1 demonstrated that members of the public who were led to believe that scientists aim to inform about the consequences of climate change (rather than to persuade to take a particular course of action) reported higher trust in scientists and stronger willingness to engage in environmental behaviour. Study 2 revealed that this effect was moderated by the style of the scientific message that participants were exposed to. Participants who expected scientists to engage in persuasion were more receptive to persuasive rather than informative messages, while the opposite was true for participants who believed that scientists’ purpose was purely to inform. In both studies the effects of perceived motives on willingness to act in line with the climate change messages were mediated through trust in scientists. The data demonstrate that managing public expectations about the purposes of science communication and delivering messages that are consistent with these expectations are a key to successful communication of climate science.

[1]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  The Cognitive Mediation Hypothesis Revisited: An Empirical Response to Methodological and Theoretical Criticism , 1996 .

[2]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Richard Reardon,et al.  Forewarning of content and involvement: Consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion , 1992 .

[4]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis , 2007, Science.

[5]  Gerald Echterhoff,et al.  Audience-tuning effects on memory: the role of shared reality. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  S. Marette,et al.  The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain , 2011, Public understanding of science.

[7]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analytic syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[9]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Attitude Importance, Forewarning of Message Content, and Resistance to Persuasion , 2000 .

[10]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  Effective communication about complex environmental issues: Perceived quality of information about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration , 2010 .

[11]  Sarah R. Davies,et al.  Constructing Communication , 2008 .

[12]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Resistance and Persuasion , 2004 .

[13]  Maja Horst.  Public Expectations of Gene Therapy , 2007 .

[14]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[15]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Stages in the Analysis of Persuasive Messages: The Role of Causal Attributions and Message Comprehension. , 1981 .

[17]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. , 1998 .

[18]  Pamela J. Bretschneider,et al.  The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications , 2011 .

[19]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Audience-Tuning Effects on Memory The Role of Audience Status in Sharing Reality , 2009 .

[20]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[21]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[23]  O. Klein,et al.  Stereotypes and Behavioral Confirmation: From Interpersonal to Intergroup Perspectives , 2003 .

[24]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing of persuasive in-group messages. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma , 1999 .

[26]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Coordinating beliefs in conversation , 1992 .

[27]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[28]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Exploiting Attractiveness in Persuasion: Senders’ Implicit Theories About Receivers’ Processing Motivation , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[30]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .

[31]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge: Lay People's and Researchers' Beliefs about the Psychology of Advertising , 1995 .

[32]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation , 1993 .

[34]  G. Moskowitz.  The mediational effects of attributions and information processing in minority social influence , 1996 .

[35]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Social psychological models of interpersonal communication , 1996 .

[36]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. , 1977 .

[37]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. , 1996 .

[38]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[39]  J. Delia,et al.  The constructivist approach to communication , 1982 .

[40]  D. Holt.  How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices , 1995 .

[41]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[42]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[43]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions , 2011 .

[44]  Brian Hare,et al.  From Nonhuman to Human Mind , 2007 .

[45]  Daniel Hogan,et al.  The 30-Sec Sale: Using Thin-Slice Judgments to Evaluate Sales Effectiveness , 2006 .

[46]  Mitchell Ness,et al.  The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty , 2003 .

[47]  G. Bohner,et al.  Distinctiveness across topics in minority and majority influence: An attributional analysis and preliminary data , 1996 .

[48]  Bart W. Terwel,et al.  How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2009 .