Do women only talk about "female issues"? Gender and issue discussion on Twitter

Purpose Recent research has shown that female US House candidates were more likely to talk about so-called “female issues” on Twitter during the 2012 election (Evans and Clark, 2015). In this paper, the author extends this former work by investigating the Twitter activity of all US House representatives during their 2012 election and seven months later (June and July of 2013). The purpose of this paper is to show that women do talk more about “female issues” than men, but do not only focus on these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper content analyzes the tweets sent by female and male representatives in the 113th Congress during their 2012 elections, and seven months later. Findings Female representatives spend significantly more time devoted to “female issues” on Twitter than male representatives, but their time is not dominated entirely by “female issues.” Even though the difference is not statistically significant, women sent more tweets about “male issues” than men both during and after the 2012 election. Women tweet more than men about “women,” but they also care about business issues, as is evidenced by that issue being one of the most discussed on Twitter by female representatives during both the election and seven months later. Originality/value Unlike other studies on gender and issue discussion, this paper examines a new type of communication: Twitter. Tweets are split by issue type (female/male) and the author sees that while women do discuss “female issues” more than men, they do not exclude “male issues.” This paper also shows that women focus on “female issues” both during elections and after.

[1]  Sue Thomas.  The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[2]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[3]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[4]  M. McDermott.  Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections , 1998 .

[5]  Peter A. Shocket,et al.  Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates , 1993 .

[6]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Do Women Legislators Matter? , 1993, American politics quarterly.

[7]  Sue Thomas.  How Women Legislate , 1994 .

[8]  S. Larson.  “Running as Women”? , 2001 .

[9]  Kathleen Dolan.  Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites , 2005 .

[10]  Kim Fridkin Kahn.  Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates , 1992, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  Dianne G. Bystrom.  Gender and Elections: Advertising, Web Sites, and Media Coverage: Gender and Communication along the Campaign Trail , 2009 .

[12]  Girish J. Gulati.  Members of Congress and Presentation of Self on the World Wide Web , 2004 .

[13]  P. Herrnson,et al.  Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives , 1997 .

[14]  David Niven,et al.  Do Women and Men in Congress Cultivate Different Images? Evidence from Congressional Web Sites , 2001 .

[15]  J. Mendez,et al.  Women and Representation: A Different View of the District? , 2007, Politics & Gender.

[16]  Dianne G. Bystrom.  Women as Political Communication Sources and Audiences , 2004 .

[17]  L. Huddy,et al.  The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office , 1993 .

[18]  H. Pitkin.  The Concept of Representation , 1969 .

[19]  Stephen Green,et al.  Rockin' robins: Do congresswomen rule the roost in the Twittersphere? , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  J. Koch.  Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates , 1999 .

[21]  K. Andersen,et al.  Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits , 1993 .

[22]  Kim Fridkin Kahn.  Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate , 1993 .

[23]  K. Bratton.  The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting , 2002 .

[24]  Julie A. Dolan,et al.  Credit Claiming from the U.S. House , 2004 .

[25]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults , 2011, New Media Soc..

[26]  Kim Fridkin Kahn,et al.  WOMEN CANDIDATES IN THE NEWS: AN EXAMINATION OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN U.S. SENATE CAMPAIGN COVERAGE , 1991 .

[27]  Paul S. Herrnson,et al.  Women Running “as Women”: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[28]  S. Gershon.  Communicating Female and Minority Interests Online: A Study of Web Site Issue Discussion among Female, Latino, and African American Members of Congress , 2008 .

[29]  M. Swers.  Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women 's Issue Bills Than Their Male Colleagues? , 1998 .

[30]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  “You Tweet Like a Girl!” , 2016 .