Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.

The design of a two-channel compression hearing aid for persons with moderate sensorineural hearing losses with recruitment is described. The aid applies slow-acting automatic gain control (AGC) to the whole signal, and then splits the signal into two bands, with separate fast-acting (syllabic) AGC in each band. Trials evaluating the aid have shown that it allows speech in quiet to be understood over a wide range of sound levels without any need to adjust the controls on the aid. It also gives speech intelligibility in noise superior to that allowed by a comparable linear (non-compression) aid, a comparable single-channel compression aid, and by unaided listening. Pilot experiments comparing two different methods for fitting the aid suggest that fitting using speech as the test signal is superior to fitting using narrow band tonal signals.

[1]  R. Lippmann,et al.  Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  Rachelle Abramoritz,et al.  Frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids , 1979 .

[4]  B. Moore,et al.  Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H Levitt,et al.  Hearing impairment and sensory aids: a tutorial review. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  R S Abramovitz,et al.  Frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids. , 1980, Journal of communication disorders.

[8]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[10]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. I. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W A Dreschler,et al.  The use of single-channel compression for the improvement of speech intelligibility. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  K Welzl-Müller,et al.  Signal-to-noise threshold with and without hearing aid. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[14]  B C Moore,et al.  Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. , 1985, British journal of audiology.

[15]  D Byrne,et al.  The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  L E Humes,et al.  An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  E. de Boer,et al.  Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  D Byrne.  Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.