From ground to aerial communication: dissecting WLAN 802.11n for the drones

Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) employed in civil missions are receiving remarkable attention from both research and industry. UAVs embed more and more sensor technology, and their small mounted cameras allow for efficient mapping of large areas in short time. Yet, civil missions such as rescue operations would need a timely delivery of high-resolution images, which calls for high-speed communication such as provided by WLAN IEEE 802.11n. Driven by extensive experiments, the key finding of this contribution is that 802.11n performs poorly in highly mobile and aerial scenarios, as the throughput between UAVs drops far below the theoretical maximum as soon as they become airborne. This is partially caused by the limitations of the embedded hardware, but also a result of the network dynamics of the aerial links. In order to dissect the origins of the low performance figures, we isolate the potential causes of degradation by analyzing our data of throughput, packet loss, aircraft and antenna orientation, and cruise speed. We discuss quantitatively how practical it is to deliver high-resolution images when being exposed to aerial throughput. We believe that it will be a long way until micro UAVs transferring large-size data become reality and argue for a new amendment of IEEE 802.11 addressing the communication among highly-mobile UAVs.

[1]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Achieving air-ground communications in 802.11 networks with three-dimensional aerial mobility , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[2]  C. Strecha,et al.  The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery , 2012 .

[3]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[4]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Channel measurements over 802.11a-based UAV-to-ground links , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[5]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd Edition) by , 2012 .

[6]  Ilenia Tinnirello,et al.  On the side-effects of proprietary solutions for fading and interference mitigation in IEEE 802.11b/g outdoor links , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Suman Banerjee,et al.  802.11n under the microscope , 2008, IMC '08.

[8]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.

[9]  Simon Heimlicher,et al.  Characterizing 802.11n aerial communication , 2013, ANC '13.

[10]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A Simple and Robust Fixed-Wing Platform for Outdoor Flying Robot Experiments , 2007 .

[11]  John Terry,et al.  OFDM Wireless LANs: A Theoretical and Practical Guide , 2001 .

[12]  Gianni A. Di Caro,et al.  Search and rescue using mixed swarms of heterogeneous agents : modeling , simulation , and planning , 2012 .

[13]  Daniel Henkel,et al.  On Controlled Node Mobility in Delay-Tolerant Networks of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2006 .

[14]  Konstantinos Pelechrinis,et al.  Experimental characterization of 802.11n link quality at high rates , 2010, WiNTECH '10.

[15]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[16]  Marc Pollefeys,et al.  PIXHAWK: A micro aerial vehicle design for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Timothy X. Brown,et al.  Delay-tolerant communication using mobile robotic helper nodes , 2008, 2008 6th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks and Workshops.