Comparing robotic control using a spiking model of cerebellar network and a gain adapting forward-inverse model

Internal models inspired from the functioning of cerebellum are being increasingly used to predict and control movements of anthropomorphic manipulators. A major function of cerebellum is to fine tune the body movements with precision and are comparative to capabilities of artificial neural network. Several studies have focused on encoding the real-world information to neuronal responses but temporal information was not given due importance. Spiking neural network accounts to conversion of temporal information into the adaptive learning process. In this study, cerebellum like network was reconstructed which encodes spatial information to kinematic parameters, self-optimized by learning patterns as seen in rat cerebellum. Learning rules were incorporated into our model. Performance of the model was compared to an optimal control model and have evaluated the role of bioinspired models in representing inverse kinematics through applications to a low cost robotic arm developed at the lab. Artificial neural network of Kawato was used to compare with our existing model because of their similarity to biological circuit as seen in a real brain. Kawato's paired forward inverse model has used to train for fast movement based tasks which resembles human based motor tasks. Result suggest kinematics of a 6 DOF robotic arm was internally represented and this may have potential application in neuroprosthesis.

[1]  M Ito,et al.  Neurophysiological aspects of the cerebellar motor control system. , 1970, International journal of neurology.

[2]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[3]  M. Fujita,et al.  Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Kawato,et al.  A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Storage of Correlated Patterns in Standard and Bistable Purkinje Cell Models , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Timothy J. Ebner,et al.  The cerebellum for jocks and nerds alike , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[8]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  A G Barto,et al.  Prediction of complex two-dimensional trajectories by a cerebellar model of smooth pursuit eye movement. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Weimin Han,et al.  Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations: Atkinson/Numerical , 2009 .

[11]  Shyam Diwakar,et al.  Classifying Movement Articulation for Robotic Arms via Machine Learning , 2013 .

[12]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Shyam Diwakar,et al.  Computationally EfficientBio-realistic Reconstructions of Cerebellar Neuron Spiking Patterns , 2014, ICONIAAC '14.

[14]  R. R. Llinás,et al.  Inferior olive oscillation as the temporal basis for motricity and oscillatory reset as the basis for motor error correction , 2009, Neuroscience.

[15]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Second Edition , 2006, The Morgan Kaufmann series in data management systems.

[17]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  D Gamez,et al.  iSpike: a spiking neural interface for the iCub robot , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[19]  Shyam Diwakar,et al.  Computational Neuroscience of Timing, Plasticity and Function in Cerebellum Microcircuits , 2017 .

[20]  P. Dean,et al.  The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Complementing Education via Virtual Labs: Implementation and Deployment of Remote Laboratories and Usage Analysis in South Indian Villages , 2016, Int. J. Online Eng..

[22]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Internal models engaged by brain-computer interface control , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[24]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[25]  Angelo Arleo,et al.  Internal Models in the Cerebellum: A Coupling Scheme for Online and Offline Learning in Procedural Tasks , 2010, SAB.

[26]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Firing patterns in the adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  G. Ferrigno,et al.  An integrated motor control loop of a human-like robotic arm: Feedforward, feedback and cerebellum-based learning , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[28]  John Stein,et al.  Cerebellar forward models to control movement , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Bipin Nair,et al.  Enabling a Freely Accessible Open Source Remotely Controlled Robotic Articulator with a Neuro-Inspired Control Algorithm , 2017, Int. J. Online Eng..

[30]  Marcus J Fuhrer,et al.  Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity Executive Summary , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  S. Appavu alias Balamurugan,et al.  Insight into Data Preprocessing: Theory and Practice: Data Mining Perspective , 2012 .

[32]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[33]  Thierry Nieus,et al.  A Realistic Large-Scale Model of the Cerebellum Granular Layer Predicts Circuit Spatio-Temporal Filtering Properties , 2009, Front. Cell. Neurosci..