Imaging Cerenkov emission as a quality assurance tool in electron radiotherapy

A new potential quality assurance (QA) method is explored (including assessment of depth dose, dose linearity, dose rate linearity and beam profile) for clinical electron beams based on imaging Cerenkov light. The potential of using a standard commercial camera to image Cerenkov light generated from electrons in water for fast QA measurement of a clinical electron beam was explored and compared to ionization chamber measurements. The new method was found to be linear with dose and independent of dose rate (to within 3%). The uncorrected practical range measured in Cerenkov images was found to overestimate the actual value by 3 mm in the worst case. The field size measurements underestimated the dose at the edges by 5% without applying any correction factor. Still, the measured field size could be used to monitor relative changes in the beam profile. Finally, the beam-direction profile measurements were independent of the field size within 2%. A simulation was also performed of the deposited energy and of Cerenkov production in water using GEANT4. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the measured light distribution around the water phantom, to reproduce Cerenkov images and to find the relation between deposited energy and Cerenkov production. The camera was modelled as a pinhole camera in GEANT4, to attempt to reproduce Cerenkov images. Simulations of the deposited energy and the Cerenkov light production agreed with each other for a pencil beam of electrons, while for a realistic field size, Cerenkov production in the build-up region overestimated the dose by +8%.

[1]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Determination of the refractive index of highly scattering human tissue by optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Optics letters.

[2]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Superficial dosimetry imaging of Čerenkov emission in electron beam radiotherapy of phantoms , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  S. Brown,et al.  Cerenkov radiation and its applications , 1955 .

[4]  I. Nikolov,et al.  Analysis of the dispersion of optical plastic materials , 2007 .

[5]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Quantitative Cherenkov emission spectroscopy for tissue oxygenation assessment , 2012, Optics express.

[6]  Steven B. Smith,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Guide for Engineers and Scientists , 2002 .

[7]  Visual sensations during megavoltage radiotherapy to the orbit attributable to Cherenkov radiation , 2007 .

[8]  M. R. Cleland,et al.  Comparisons of Monte Carlo and ICRU electron energy vs. range equations , 2004 .

[9]  Riccardo Calandrino,et al.  In vivo 18F-FDG tumour uptake measurements in small animals using Cerenkov radiation , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Xiaoqin Jiang,et al.  Evaluation of the ArcCHECK QA system for IMRT and VMAT verification. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  Jimin Liang,et al.  Three-dimensional Noninvasive Monitoring Iodine-131 Uptake in the Thyroid Using a Modified Cerenkov Luminescence Tomography Approach , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  S R Cherry,et al.  Optical imaging of Cerenkov light generation from positron-emitting radiotracers , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Jie Tian,et al.  Experimental Cerenkov luminescence tomography of the mouse model with SPECT imaging validation. , 2010, Optics express.

[14]  Stuart Robson,et al.  PRINCIPAL POINT BEHAVIOUR AND CALIBRATION PARAMETER MODELS FOR KODAK DCS CAMERAS , 1998 .

[15]  Simon R Cherry,et al.  Cerenkov luminescence tomography for small-animal imaging. , 2010, Optics letters.

[16]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Sidney F. Ray,et al.  Applied Photographic Optics: Lenses and optical systems for photography, film, video, electronic and digital imaging , 2002 .

[18]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[19]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Projection imaging of photon beams by the Čerenkov effect. , 2012, Medical physics.

[20]  Johan Axelsson,et al.  Cerenkov emission induced by external beam radiation stimulates molecular fluorescence. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Michael Fenech,et al.  Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development , 2014, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[22]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Čerenkov radiation emission and excited luminescence (CREL) sensitivity during external beam radiation therapy: Monte Carlo and tissue oxygenation phantom studies , 2012, Biomedical optics express.