Multiple aspects of plasticity in clutch size vary among populations of a globally distributed songbird.

Plasticity in life-history characteristics can influence many ecological and evolutionary phenomena, including how invading organisms cope with novel conditions in new locations or how environmental change affects organisms in native locations. Variation in reaction norm attributes is a critical element to understanding plasticity in life history, yet we know relatively little about the ways in which reaction norms vary within and among populations. We amassed data on clutch size from marked females in eight populations of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) from North America and Europe. We exploited repeated measures of clutch size to assess both the extent of within-individual phenotypic plasticity and among-individual variation and to test alternative hypotheses about the underlying causes of reaction norm shape, particularly the decline in clutch size with date. Across all populations, females of this multibrooded species altered their clutch size with respect to date, attempt order, and the interaction of date and order, producing a reaction norm in multidimensional environmental space. The reaction norm fits that predicted by a model in which optimal clutch size is driven by a decline with date hatched in the ability of offspring to recruit. Our results do not fit those predicted for other proposed causes of a seasonal decline in clutch size. We also found significant differences between populations in response to date and the date by attempt order interaction. We tested the prediction that the relationship with date should be increasingly negative as breeding season becomes shorter but found steeper declines in clutch size with date in populations with longer seasons, contrary to the prediction. Populations also differed in the level of among-individual variation in reaction norm intercept, but we found no evidence of among-individual variation in reaction norm slope. We show that complex reaction norms in life-history characters exhibit within- and among-population variance. The nature of this variance is only partially consistent with current life-history theory and stimulates expansions of such theory to accommodate complexities in adaptive life history.

[1]  The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity , 2008 .

[2]  S. Nylin,et al.  Adaptive plasticity and plasticity as an adaptation : a selective review of plasticity in animal morphology and life history , 1995 .

[3]  S. Boutin.  Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future , 1990 .

[4]  D. J. Anderson,et al.  Food limitation explains most clutch size variation in the Nazca booby , 2001 .

[5]  Martijn van de Pol,et al.  Quantifying individual variation in reaction norms: how study design affects the accuracy, precision and power of random regression models , 2012 .

[6]  S. Verhulst,et al.  The timing of birds' breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Martijn van de Pol,et al.  A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. T. Murphy.  TEMPORAL COMPONENTS OF REPRODUCTIVE VARIABILITY IN EASTERN KINGBIRDS (TYRANNUS TYRANNUS) , 1986 .

[9]  Niels J. Dingemanse,et al.  Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  T. Williams.  Mechanisms Underlying the Costs of Egg Production , 2005 .

[11]  Ted R. Anderson,et al.  Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow: From Genes to Populations , 2006 .

[12]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Genetic variation for clutch size in natural populations of birds from a reaction norm perspective , 2005 .

[13]  J. J. Fontaine,et al.  Nest predation, food, and female age explain seasonal declines in clutch size , 2011, Evolutionary Ecology.

[14]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND GENETIC VARIATION FOR REPRODUCTIVE REACTION NORMS IN A WILD BIRD POPULATION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  D. Mock,et al.  How Consistently are Good Parents Good Parents? Repeatability of Parental Care in the House Sparrow, Passer domesticus , 2003 .

[17]  R. McCleery,et al.  The individual optimization of fitness: variation in reproductive output, including clutch size, mean nestling mass and offspring recruitment, in manipulated broods of great tits Parus major , 2001 .

[18]  Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  D. Lack.  The Significance of Clutch‐size , 2008 .

[20]  I. Owens,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Life Histories, Mating Systems and Extinction , 2002 .

[21]  O. Chastel,et al.  Brood size and body condition in the House Sparrow Passer domesticus: the influence of brooding behaviour , 2002 .

[22]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[23]  A. D. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1965 .

[24]  Alastair J Wilson,et al.  Exploring plasticity in the wild: laying date–temperature reaction norms in the common gull Larus canus , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  O. Rätti,et al.  A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN CURRENT REPRODUCTION AND MOLT IN THE PIED FLYCATCHER - AN EXPERIMENT , 1994 .

[26]  Massimo Pigliucci,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture , 2001 .

[27]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Nutrient or energy limitation on egg formation: a feeding experiment in great tits , 1997 .

[28]  D. Lack.  The Significance of Clutch-Size in the Partridge (Perdix perdix) , 1947 .

[29]  R. Frankham.  Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? , 1997, Heredity.

[30]  S. Stearns.  The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic PlasticityPhenotypic sources of variation among organisms can be described by developmental switches and reaction norms , 1989 .

[31]  T. E. Martin.  Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective , 1987 .

[32]  R. Lande.  Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  The influence of sex and body size on nestling survival and recruitment in the house sparrow , 2010 .

[34]  Van Noordwijk,et al.  Reaction Norms in EcologyStudies of the great tit exemplify the combination of ecophysiology and quantitative genetics , 1989 .

[35]  D. Westneat,et al.  Complex interactions among temporal variables affect the plasticity of clutch size in a multi-brooded bird. , 2009, Ecology.

[36]  H. Klomp,et al.  The Determination of Clutch-Size in Birds a Review , 2015 .

[37]  S. Scheiner.  Genetics and Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity , 1993 .

[38]  D. Nussey,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[39]  R. Dukas.  Dynamics of learning in the context of courtship in Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  Alastair J Wilson,et al.  CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN TWO GREAT TIT (PARUS MAJOR) POPULATIONS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  R. Drent,et al.  The Prudent Parent: Energetic Adjustments in Avian Breeding 1) , 1980 .

[42]  R. McCleery,et al.  Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Climate Change in a Wild Bird Population , 2008, Science.

[43]  Ted Anderson,et al.  Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow , 2006 .

[44]  D. Schluter,et al.  Time, Condition, and the Seasonal Decline of Avian Clutch Size , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[45]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[46]  T. Burke,et al.  Broad‐scale latitudinal patterns of genetic diversity among native European and introduced house sparrow (Passer domesticus) populations , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[47]  D. Gibbons,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Clutch Size in British Birds , 1993 .

[48]  D. Mock,et al.  Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: size matters , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  G. Parker,et al.  Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? , 2002 .

[50]  J. Loman.  A model of clutch size determination in birds , 1982, Oecologia.

[51]  Ádám Z. Lendvai,et al.  Natural variation in stress response is related to post-stress parental effort in male house sparrows , 2010, Hormones and Behavior.

[52]  A. Husby,et al.  Causes and consequences of adaptive seasonal sex ratio variation in house sparrows. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[53]  A. Minelli.  Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes , 2005 .

[54]  Bernt-Erik Sæther,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS SPATIOTEMPORAL DEMOGRAPHY OF A HOUSE SPARROW METAPOPULATION IN A CORRELATED ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[55]  Ádám Z. Lendvai,et al.  Risk-taking and survival in the House Sparrow Passer domesticus: Are plumage ornaments costly? , 2007 .

[56]  W. Hochachka.  Seasonal Decline in Reproductive Performance of Song Sparrows , 1990 .

[57]  R. Woltereck,et al.  Weitere experimentelle untersuchungen über Artänderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden , 1913, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[58]  I. Steinsland,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of a Sexual Ornament in the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus): The Role of Indirect Selection Within and Between Sexes , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  C. Juday.  Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziel über das Wesen quantitativer Artuntershiede bei Daphniden , 1910 .