What Makes People Read an Online Review? The Relative Effects of Posting Time and Helpfulness on Review Readership

This study explores the factors that make online customers select which reviews to read among the various ones on the Web. While most of literature on online consumer reviews has conveniently assumed that more helpful reviews would be read by more customers, no empirical study has tested whether the helpfulness assessment actually increases readership. Hence, this study explores various factors affecting consumer review readership and proposes that although helpfulness assessment promotes the readership of a review, the most dominant factor contributing to readership is the time of posting. A review posted late loses a significant chance of being read by consumers even if it is assessed as helpful by other readers. The hypotheses are tested using the data collected from Amazon.com , and the result of the study advises practitioners to display reviews in a manner that lessens the impact of posting time while enhancing the helpfulness voting systems.

[1]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[2]  David Schuff,et al.  Is It the Review or the Reviewer? a Multi-Method Approach to Determine the Antecedents of Online Review Helpfulness , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Qing Cao,et al.  Exploring determinants of voting for the "helpfulness" of online user reviews: A text mining approach , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Nikolaos Korfiatis,et al.  The Influences of Negativity and Review Quality on the Helpfulness of Online Reviews , 2011, ICIS.

[6]  Yue Lu,et al.  Exploiting social context for review quality prediction , 2010, WWW '10.

[7]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  WWW 2009 MADRID! Track: Data Mining / Session: Opinions How Opinions are Received by Online Communities: A Case Study on Amazon.com Helpfulness Votes , 2022 .

[8]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .

[9]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews , 2009, RecSys '09.

[11]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[14]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The long tail or the short tail: The category-specific impact of eWOM on sales distribution , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..