A graphical approach to characterize sub-daily flow regimes and evaluate its alterations due to hydropeaking.

Most flow regime characterizations focus on long time scale flow patterns, which are not precise enough to capture key components of short-term flow fluctuations. Recent proposed methods describing sub-daily flow fluctuations are focused on limited components of the flow regime being unable to fully represent it, or on the identification of peaking events based on subjectively defined thresholds, being unsuitable for evaluations of short-term flow regime alterations through comparisons between regulated and free-flowing rivers. This study aims to launch an innovative approach based on the visual display of quantitative information to address the challenge of the short-term hydrologic characterization and evaluation of alteration resulting from hydropeaking. We propose a graphical method to represent a discrete set of ecologically relevant indices that characterize and evaluate the alteration of sub-daily flow regimes. The frequency of occurrence of classified values of a descriptive hydrological variable is represented in a map-like graph where longitude, latitude and altitude represent the Julian day, the value of the variable and the frequency of occurrence, respectively. Subsequently, we tested the method on several rivers, both free-flowing and subjected to hydropower production. The advantages of our approach compared to other analytical methods are: (i) it displays a great amount of information without oversimplification; (ii) it takes into account changes in the intensity, timing and frequency of the sub-daily flows, without needing a priori defined thresholds to identify hydropeaking events; and (iii) it supports the Water Framework Directive goal. Specifically, results from applications of our graphical method agree with Sauterleute and Charmasson (2014) analytical method.

[1]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[2]  J.-L. Boillat,et al.  Hydropeaking indicators for characterization of the Upper-Rhone River in Switzerland , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[3]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Understanding Graphs and Tables , 1992 .

[4]  P. Parasiewicz Application of MesoHABSIM and target fish community approaches to restoration of the Quinebaug River, Connecticut and Massachusetts, USA , 2008 .

[5]  A. Harby,et al.  Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo Salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking , 2001 .

[6]  B. Letcher,et al.  Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale , 2010 .

[7]  R. Vogel,et al.  The impact of dams on flood flows in the United States , 2011 .

[8]  B. Barlaup,et al.  Effects of hydropeaking on the spawning behaviour of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and brown trout Salmo trutta. , 2016, Journal of fish biology.

[9]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Analysis and Information Visualization: Graphical Display for Effective Communication of Research Results , 2008 .

[10]  Otto Moog,et al.  Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts , 1993 .

[11]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[12]  Julian Friedrich Sauterleute,et al.  A computational tool for the characterisation of rapid fluctuations in flow and stage in rivers caused by hydropeaking , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Qiongfang Li,et al.  Downstream effects of a hydropeaking dam on ecohydrological conditions at subdaily to monthly time scales , 2015 .

[14]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[15]  Guido Zolezzi,et al.  Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River, Italy , 2009 .

[16]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[17]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Application of wavelet analysis for monitoring the hydrologic effects of dam operation: Glen Canyon Dam and the Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona , 2005 .

[18]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES? , 1977 .

[19]  R. Céréghino,et al.  Influence of hydropeaking on the distribution and larval development of the plecoptera from a mountain stream , 1998 .

[20]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS 1 , 2004 .

[21]  William M. Shyu,et al.  Local Regression Models , 2017 .

[22]  R. Norris,et al.  Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams , 2009 .

[23]  K. Alfredsen,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of hydropeaking flow alterations applied to several European streams , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[24]  Theodore A. Endreny,et al.  Analysis of Daily Peaking and Run‐of‐River Operations with Flow Variability Metrics, Considering Subdaily to Seasonal Time Scales , 2014 .

[25]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[26]  Manuel Contreras,et al.  Effects of hydropeaking on the hydrodynamics of a stratified reservoir: the Rapel Reservoir case study , 2015 .

[27]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Characterizing Sub‐Daily Flow Regimes: Implications of Hydrologic Resolution on Ecohydrology Studies , 2015 .

[28]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[29]  M. Newson,et al.  The use of indices of flow variability in assessing the hydrological and instream habitat impacts of upland afforestation and drainage , 2002 .

[30]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration , 2009 .

[31]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems , 2010 .

[32]  B. Biggs,et al.  Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance , 2000 .

[33]  Michael Macdonald-Ross,et al.  How numbers are shown , 1977 .

[34]  Jessica D. Lundquist,et al.  Seasonal and Spatial Patterns in Diurnal Cycles in Streamflow in the Western United States , 2002 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .