Clinical and finite element analysis of a modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and stem component in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.

OBJECTIVE To determine the biomechanical characteristics and potential clinical efficacy of a cementless modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a variable head (50 to 80 millimeters) and stem (length 120 to 280 millimeters, diameter 10 to 20 millimeters) component in patients with pertrochanteric femoral fracture. DESIGN Finite element analysis (FEA) of different lengths and diameters of prosthesis components and first clinical prospective study in pertrochanteric femoral fracture. METHOD Using a 3D-CAD program, a model of femoral cortical bone with a pertrochanteric fracture was created and combined with a model of the prosthesis. This model was transferred into an FEA program. After applying a torsion-bending load of 2,000 N (25 degrees, 45 degrees) on the prosthesis, stress distribution in the cortical bone was determined for different lengths (160 to 240 millimeters) and diameters (10 and 12 millimeters) of stem. PATIENTS Twenty-eight patients with pertrochanteric fractures (very unstable or osteoarthritis) were treated with a modular hip arthroplasty. Complications, fracture healing, and results at first follow-up (average 13 months) were determined. RESULTS FEA analysis indicated that reduction in stress was less when a prosthesis with a short stem was used. Shear stress in the interface bone/prosthesis was not affected by stem length. Prostheses with thin stems produced higher sheer stresses than those with thick stems. Results of FEA were used as the basis for clinical application of the device. None of the patients died, and all patients were able to walk, although some needed a cane or walker after surgery. There was no increase in thigh pain compared with reported pretrauma levels. Radiographs showed subsidence of up to 5 millimeters in 20 percent of patients. However, all but one prosthesis was stable at follow-up. Fracture healing was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS If proximal fixation of a femoral uncemented stem cannot be achieved, stem diameter should provide maximum cortical contact to reduce sheer stress. Longer stems do not necessarily provide additional stability. By using this prosthesis and selection method, a good outcome at first follow-up was observed.

[1]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  B. Manaster,et al.  Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  P. Gregory,et al.  Bone-ingrowth hip prostheses in asymptomatic patients: radiographic features. , 1988, Radiology.

[5]  H. Mallmin,et al.  The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  H. Wagner.  [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint]. , 1989, Der Orthopade.

[7]  C. Engh,et al.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  H. Aro,et al.  Intramedullary fixation of high subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a study comparing two implant designs, the Gamma nail and the intramedullary hip screw. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  H. Willert,et al.  [The reaction of bone to bone-cement in the replacement of the hip joint]. , 1972, Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie.

[10]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  T. Bauer,et al.  Polyethylene debris-induced osteolysis and loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. A cause of late failure. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  J. Galante,et al.  Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  A. Alho,et al.  Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  J. Moreland,et al.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old. A Twenty to Twenty-five-Year Follow-up Note* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.