Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a policy of standard antenatal care which included plotting fundal height measurements on customised antenatal charts in the community.

[1]  P. Danielian,et al.  Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in antepartum stillbirths , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in anteparturn stillbirths , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Reduction of False‐Positive Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction by Application of Customized Fetal Growth Standards , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  L. Kean,et al.  Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population , 1996 .

[6]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low‐risk population , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  J. Gardosi,et al.  An adjustable fetal weight standard , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  J. Newnham,et al.  Screening for the Small Fetus: A Study of the Relative Efficacies of Ultrasound Biometry and Symphysiofundal Height , 1995, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  T. Steingrimsdottir,et al.  Symphysis‐fundus height: construction of a new Swedish reference curve, based on ultrasonically dated pregnancies , 1995, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[10]  J. Spencer,et al.  Fetal size and growth in Bangladeshi pregnancies , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  I. Johnson,et al.  The individualised birth weight ratio: a new method of identifying intrauterine growth retardation , 1994 .

[12]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studies , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  S. Robson,et al.  Identification of fetal growth retardation: Comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  I. Kennedy.  The implications of introducing the symphyseal‐fundal height‐measurement. A prospective randomized controlled trial , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Customised antenatal growth charts , 1992, The Lancet.

[16]  M. Rogers,et al.  Fundal height: does prior knowledge of gestational age influence the measurement? , 1992 .

[17]  S. Sachdeva,et al.  Altered fetal growth: antenatal diagnosis by symphysis‐fundal height in India and comparison with western charts , 1991, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[19]  P. Nielsen,et al.  The implications of introducing the symphyseal‐fundal height‐measurement. A prospective randomized controlled trial , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  I. Kennedy.  The symphysis-fundus height graph and fetal growth retardation: gimmick or useful clinical tool? , 1990, Journal of tropical pediatrics.

[21]  P Sarmandal,et al.  A comparison of three methods of assessing interobserver variation applied to measurement of the symphysis‐fundal height , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  Intrauterine growth retardation: Let's be clear about it , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  R. M. Patterson,et al.  Neonatal morphometrics and perinatal outcome: who is growth retarded? , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  J. Grant.  Screening for light‐for‐gestational age infants: a comparison of three simple measurements , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[25]  An audit of the detection and management of small‐for‐gestational age babies , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  B. Persson,et al.  Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[27]  K. Rosenberg,et al.  An audit of the detection and management of small‐for‐gestational age babies , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  M. Rogers,et al.  Evaluation of Fundal Height Measurement in Antenatal Care , 1985, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[29]  L. Westergaard,et al.  THE PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF SYMPHYSIS‐FUNDUS DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS DURING PREGNANCY , 1985, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[30]  G. Lindmark,et al.  Symphysis‐fundus Measurements and Intrauterine Growth Retardation , 1984, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Antenatal Screening by Measurement of Symphysis‐Fundus Height , 1983, British medical journal.

[32]  T. Aitchison,et al.  Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardation , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[33]  C. Redman,et al.  PREDICTION OF SMALL‐FOR‐DATES INFANTS BY MEASUREMENT OF SYMPHYSIAL‐FUNDAL‐HEIGHT , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[34]  B. Westin,et al.  SYMPHYSIS‐FUNDUS MEASUREMENT IN PREDICTION OF FETAL GROWTH DISTURBANCES , 1981, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[35]  I. Macgillivray,et al.  IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE? , 1980, The Lancet.

[36]  T. Aitchison,et al.  Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule. , 1980, British medical journal.

[37]  E. Coles,et al.  NOMOGRAMS FOR PRECISE DETERMINATION OF BIRTH WEIGHT FOR DATES , 1980, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[38]  J. Low,et al.  The clinical prediction of intrauterine growth retardation. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  J. Villar,et al.  Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. , 1978, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  B. Westin.  Comparison with Biochemical Supervision , 1977 .

[41]  J. Beazley,et al.  Fallacy of the Fundal Height* , 1970, British medical journal.

[42]  F. Loeffler.  CLINICAL FOETAL WEIGHT PREDICTION , 1967, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.