Flight deck interval management and delegated separation for equivalent visual operations

An emerging Next Generation Air Transportation System concept — Equivalent Visual Operations (EVO) — can be achieved using an electronic means to provide sufficient visibility of the external world and other required flight references on flight deck displays that enable the safety, operational tempos, and visual flight rules (VFR)-like procedures for all weather conditions. Synthetic and enhanced flight vision system technologies are critical enabling technologies to EVO. Current research evaluated concepts for flight deck-based interval management (FIM) operations, integrated with Synthetic Vision and Enhanced Vision flight-deck displays and technologies. One concept involves delegated flight deck-based separation, in which the flight crews were paired with another aircraft and responsible for spacing and maintaining separation from the paired aircraft, termed, “equivalent visual separation.” The operation required the flight crews to acquire and maintain an “equivalent visual contact” as well as to conduct manual landings in low-visibility conditions. The paper describes results that evaluated the concept of EVO delegated separation, including an off-nominal scenario in which the lead aircraft was not able to conform to the assigned spacing resulting in a loss of separation.

[1]  James M Hallock,et al.  Is the B757 Really a "Heavy" Aircraft? , 2007 .

[2]  Stephen M Alvania NextGen : let's talk , 2010 .

[3]  Ronald Verhoeven,et al.  Time-based navigation and ASAS interval managed CDA procedures , 2009 .

[4]  Anand Mundra,et al.  Air ground collaboration through delegated separation: Application for departures and arrivals , 2010, 2010 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Ana Del Amo,et al.  Controlled Time-of-Arrival Flight Trials Results and Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Rosa M. Oseguera-Lohr,et al.  FLIGHT EVALUATION OF A TIME-BASED AIRBORNE INTER- ARRIVAL SPACING TOOL , 2003 .

[7]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Comparison of Ground-Based and Airborne Function Allocation Concepts for NextGen Using Human-In-The-Loop Simulations , 2010 .

[8]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Evaluation of Airborne Precision Spacing in a Human-in-the-Loop Experiment , 2005 .

[9]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Airborne-Managed Spacing in Multiple Arrival Streams , 2004 .

[10]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  An analysis of landing rates and separations at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 1996 .

[11]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Simulation evaluation of synthetic vision as an enabling technology for equivalent visual operations , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Fast-Time Evaluations of Airborne Merging and Spacing in Terminal Arrival Operations , 2005 .

[13]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Simulation Results for Airborne Precision Spacing along Continuous Descent Arrivals , 2008 .

[14]  David A. Domino,et al.  Feasibility and Benefits of a Cockpit Traffic Display-Based Separation Procedure for Single Runway Arrivals and Departures Implications of a Pilot Survey and Laboratory Simulations , 2009 .

[15]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Operational Concept for Flight Crews to Participate in Merging and Spacing of Aircraft , 2006 .

[17]  Ronald L Stroup NextGen : bridging operations to benefits , 2010 .

[18]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Airport Arrival Capacity Benefits Due to Improved Scheduling Accuracy , 2005 .

[19]  F. Bussink,et al.  AIRBORNE PRECISION SPACING IN MERGING TERMINAL ARRIVAL ROUTES: A FAST-TIME SIMULATION STUDY , 2005 .

[20]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Pilot and controller workload and situation awareness with three traffic management concepts , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[21]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Concept of Operations for Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Displays and Decision Support Technologies , 2013 .

[22]  Terence S. Abbott A Revised Trajectory Algorithm to Support En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing Concepts , 2007 .

[23]  Lawrence L Ames,et al.  Revision and Verification of a Seven-Point Workload Estimate Scale , 1993 .

[24]  Gary W. Lohr,et al.  Evaluation of Operational Procedures for Using a Time-Based Airborne Inter-arrival Spacing Tool , 2002 .