Parturition date for a given female is highly repeatable within five roe deer populations

Births are highly synchronized among females in many mammal populations in temperate areas. Although laying date for a given female is also repeatable within populations of birds, limited evidence suggests low repeatability of parturition date for individual females in mammals, and between-population variability in repeatability has never, to our knowledge, been assessed. We quantified the repeatability of parturition date for individual females in five populations of roe deer, which we found to vary between 0.54 and 0.93. Each year, some females gave birth consistently earlier in the year, whereas others gave birth consistently later. In addition, all females followed the same lifetime trajectory for parturition date, giving birth progressively earlier as they aged. Giving birth early should allow mothers to increase offspring survival, although few females managed to do so. The marked repeatability of parturition date in roe deer females is the highest ever reported for a mammal, suggesting low phenotypic plasticity in this trait.

[1]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Advancing breeding phenology in response to environmental change in a wild red deer population , 2011 .

[2]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  Julien G. A. Martin,et al.  Never too late? Consequences of late birthdate for mass and survival of bighorn lambs , 2008, Oecologia.

[4]  N. Morellet,et al.  Using Radio-tracking and Direct Observation to Estimate Roe Deer Capreolus Capreolus Density in a Fragmented Landscape: A Pilot Study , 2007 .

[5]  L. Kruuk,et al.  The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[6]  D. Elston,et al.  Determinants of quality in a long-lived colonial species. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations , 2005, Oecologia.

[9]  Lars Gustafsson,et al.  Large–scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  J. Potti FROM MATING TO LAYING : GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IN MATING DATES AND PRELAYING PERIODS OF FEMALE PIED FLYCATCHERS FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA , 1999 .

[11]  J. Linnell,et al.  Timing and synchrony of birth in a hider species, the roe deer Capreolus capreolus , 1998 .

[12]  W. Sydeman,et al.  Repeatability in laying date and its relationship to individual quality for Common Murres , 1995 .

[13]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Timing and Synchrony of Births in Roe Deer , 1993 .

[14]  J. Swenson,et al.  Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession , 1993 .

[15]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[16]  J. Jullien,et al.  Determination de l'âge chez le faon de chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) dans son premier mois de vie , 1992 .

[17]  D. Wiggins NATURAL SELECTION ON BODY SIZE AND LAYING DATE IN THE TREE SWALLOW , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  E. Korpimäki Low repeatability of laying date and clutch size in Tengmalm's owl : an adaptation to fluctuating food conditions , 1990 .

[19]  R. Ims On the Adaptive Value of Reproductive Synchrony as a Predator-Swamping Strategy , 1990, American Naturalist.

[20]  F. Bronson,et al.  Mammalian Reproductive Biology , 1990 .

[21]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. , 1988, Science.

[22]  A. Rutberg Adaptive Hypotheses of Birth Synchrony in Ruminants: An Interspecific Test , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[23]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake , 1987 .