Abstract In both the US and French building sectors, significant efforts have been undertaken to reduce the environmental impacts of new constructions notably their fossil energy consumption and related carbon emissions. This paper summarizes the results of a comparative evaluation of optimal design specifications for office buildings for selected locations in both US and France using life cycle cost analysis approach. First, an overview of both the US and French approaches for developing building energy efficiency standards and design of high performance buildings is outlined. Then, a general approach for design optimization of energy efficient office buildings is presented. Finally, selected results of the optimal analysis are discussed. In particular, it is found that optimizing life cycle costs (LCC) resulted on average in 30% in primary energy savings for office buildings located in the US and 40% savings in France. However, it is found that LCC-based optimal building designs do not meet the French energy efficiency RT 2012 standard. When accounting for typical operating conditions, photovoltaic (PV) panels are needed in order to comply with the RT 2012 required thresholds for the total primary energy consumption of the office buildings located in the French cities considered in the analysis.
[1]
Moncef Krarti,et al.
Design optimization of energy efficient residential buildings in Tunisia
,
2012
.
[2]
Moncef Krarti,et al.
Optimal design of residential building envelope systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
2015
.
[3]
P. Torcellini,et al.
Net-Zero Energy Buildings: A Classification System Based on Renewable Energy Supply Options
,
2010
.
[4]
Karsten Voss,et al.
Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework
,
2012
.
[5]
Weimin Wang,et al.
Technical Support Document: 50% Energy Savings Design Technology Packages for Medium Office Buildings
,
2009
.
[6]
Moncef Krarti,et al.
Energy Audit of Building Systems : An Engineering Approach
,
2000
.
[7]
Björn Berggren,et al.
LCE analysis of buildings - Taking the step towards Net Zero Energy Buildings
,
2013
.
[8]
Paul Kenny,et al.
From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB)
,
2010
.
[9]
Eike Musall,et al.
Implications of weighting factors on technology preference in net zero energy buildings
,
2014
.