Application of the shape group method to conformational processes: Shape and conjugation changes in the conformers of 2‐phenyl pyrimidine

The shape group method (SGM) and the associated (a,b)‐parameter maps provide a detailed shape characterization of molecular charge distributions. This method is applied to the study of the variations of shape and conjugation of conformers of 2‐phenyl pyrimidine in their electronic ground state. Within the SGM framework, the method of (a,b)‐parameter maps provides a concise, nonvisual, algorithmic technique for shape characterization of molecules with fixed nuclear geometries. Moreover, shape codes derived from the (a,b)‐parameter maps afford a practical means for efficiently storing the shape properties of molecules in an electronic database. The shape codes of two or more charge distributions can be compared directly, and numerical measures of molecular shape similarity can be computed using a technique that is simple, fast, and inexpensive, especially in relation to direct, pairwise comparisons of electronic charge densities. The quantitative and automated nature of the method suggests applications in the field of computer‐aided molecular design. In this study, the method is used for the first time to determine detailed numerical shape codes and shape similarity measures for a nontrivial conformational problem involving changes in energy and in conjugation. Numerical shape similarity measures of eight conformers of 2‐phenyl pyrimidine are determined and correlated with variations in conformational energy and conjugation. The competing effects of steric repulsion and conjugation lead to important correlations between conformational energy and shape. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Mark A. Johnson.  A review and examination of the mathematical spaces underlying molecular similarity analysis , 1989 .

[2]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  Ab Initio Quality Electron Densities for Proteins: A MEDLA Approach , 1994 .

[3]  David L. Cooper,et al.  Ab initio computation of molecular similarity , 1985 .

[4]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  Shape group studies of molecular similarity: relative shapes of Van der Waals and electrostatic potential surfaces of nicotinic agonists , 1988 .

[5]  J. D. Petke.  Cumulative and discrete similarity analysis of electrostatic potentials and fields , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  R. Carbó,et al.  Molecular Engineering: A General Approach to QSAR , 1981 .

[7]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  Shape characterization of some molecular model surfaces , 1988 .

[8]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  Shape groups of the electronic isodensity surfaces for small molecules: Shapes of 10‐electron hydrides , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Eugene D. Fleischmann,et al.  Assessing molecular similarity from results of ab initio electronic structure calculations , 1991 .

[10]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  Molecular electron density lego approach to molecule building , 1993 .

[11]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  Realistic, detailed images of proteins and tertiary structure elements: ab initio quality electron density calculations for bovine insulin , 1994 .

[12]  Ramon Carbó,et al.  LCAO–MO similarity measures and taxonomy† , 1987 .

[13]  Ramon Carbo,et al.  How similar is a molecule to another? An electron density measure of similarity between two molecular structures , 1980 .

[14]  R. Carbó,et al.  Molecular quantum similarity measures and N-dimensional representation of quantum objects. I. Theoretical foundations† , 1992 .

[15]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  Shape group theory of van der Waals surfaces , 1989 .

[16]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  Global and local relative convexity and oriented relative convexity; application to molecular shapes in external fields , 1988 .

[17]  Wolfgang Heiden,et al.  Topological analysis of complex molecular surfaces , 1992 .

[18]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  Shape group studies of molecular similarity and regioselectivity in chemical reactions , 1988 .

[19]  Ferran Sanz,et al.  Quantum chemical structure–activity relationships on β‐carbolines as natural monoamine oxidase inhibitors , 1983 .

[20]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  Toward similarity measures for macromolecular bodies: Medla test calculations for substituted benzene systems , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  Robert Bywater,et al.  Description of molecular surface shape using Fourier descriptors , 1988 .

[22]  R. Carbó,et al.  Molecular quantum similarity measures and N‐dimensional representation of quantum objects. II. Practical applications , 1992 .

[23]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  A new computational microscope for molecules: High resolution MEDLA images of taxol and HIV-1 protease, using additive electron density fragmentation principles and fuzzy set methods , 1995 .

[24]  Marvin Johnson,et al.  Concepts and applications of molecular similarity , 1990 .

[25]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  The shape of molecular charge distributions: Group theory without symmetry , 1987 .

[26]  Gustavo A. Arteca,et al.  A complete shape characterization for molecular charge densities represented by Gaussian‐type functions , 1991 .