Laser Cleaning Improves Stem Cell Adhesion on the Dental Implant Surface during Peri-Implantitis Treatment

Dental implant therapy is a well-accepted treatment modality. Despite good predictability and success in the early stages, the risk of postplacement inflammation in the long-term periods remains an urgent problem. Surgical access and decontamination with chemical and mechanical methods are more effective than antibiotic therapy. The search for the optimal and predictable way for peri-implantitis treatment remains relevant. Here, we evaluated four cleaning methods for their ability to preserve the implant’s surface for adequate mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and differentiation. Implants isolated after peri-implantitis were subjected to cleaning with diamond bur; Ti-Ni alloy brush, air-flow, or Er,Cr:YSGG laser and cocultured with mice MSC for five weeks. Dental bur and titanium brushes destroyed the implants’ surfaces and prevented MSC attachment. Air-flow and laser minimally affected the dental implant surface microroughness, which was initially designed for good cell adhesion and bone remodeling and to provide full microbial decontamination. Anodized with titanium dioxide and sandblasted with aluminum oxide, acid-etched implants appeared to be better for laser treatment. In implants sandblasted with aluminum oxide, an acid-etched surface better preserves its topology when treated with the air-flow. These cleaning methods minimally affect the implant’s surface, so it maintains the capability to absorb osteogenic cells for further division and differentiation.

[1]  A. Scribante,et al.  Customized Minimally Invasive Protocols for the Clinical and Microbiological Management of the Oral Microbiota , 2022, Microorganisms.

[2]  Matteo Pellegrini,et al.  Domiciliary Use of Chlorhexidine vs. Postbiotic Gels in Patients with Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[3]  M. Di Domenico,et al.  The Gaseous Ozone Therapy as a Promising Antiseptic Adjuvant of Periodontal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  M. Menini,et al.  Efficacy of Instruments for Professional Oral Hygiene on Dental Implants: A Systematic Review , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[5]  N. Gutknecht,et al.  The effectiveness of diode lasers in detoxification of exposed implant surfaces in comparison with mechanical and chemical measures in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a literature review , 2021, Lasers in Dental Science.

[6]  S. Verardi,et al.  Peri-Implantitis: Application of a Protocol for the Regeneration of Deep Osseous Defects. A Retrospective Case Series , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  A. Braun,et al.  Antimicrobial Impact of Different Air-Polishing Powders in a Subgingival Biofilm Model , 2021, Antibiotics.

[8]  U. Covani,et al.  The effectiveness of the information‐motivation model and domestic brushing with a hypochlorite‐based formula on peri‐implant mucositis: A randomized clinical study , 2021, Clinical and experimental dental research.

[9]  O. Tunar,et al.  In vitro evaluation of surface cleaning methods in two different implant defect angulations: a pilot study , 2021, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment.

[10]  Geraldo R M Matos Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration , 2020, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.

[11]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Laser-assisted regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2020, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  Susanne Jung,et al.  Influence of Implant Material and Surface on Mode and Strength of Cell/Matrix Attachment of Human Adipose Derived Stromal Cell , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[13]  T. Becker,et al.  Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness. , 2019, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[14]  Su Chen,et al.  Inflammatory cytokine profiles in the crevicular fluid around clinically healthy dental implants compared to the healthy contralateral side during the early stages of implant function. , 2019, Archives of oral biology.

[15]  A. Ramanauskaite,et al.  Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis - Consensus report of working group 4. , 2019, International dental journal.

[16]  G. Zeer,et al.  [Comparative research of implants with three types of surface processing (TiUnite, SLA, RBM), control, with periimplantitis and processed by 2780 nm Er;Cr;YSGG laser]. , 2019, Stomatologiia.

[17]  G. Salvi,et al.  Peri‐implant mucositis , 2018, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  G. Salvi,et al.  Peri‐implant mucositis , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. , 2018, European journal of oral implantology.

[20]  Agnieszka Mielczarek,et al.  Oral microbiome and peri-implant diseases: where are we now? , 2017, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[21]  D. Rodrigues,et al.  Detoxification of Titanium Implant Surfaces: Evaluation of Surface Morphology and Bone-Forming Cell Compatibility , 2017, Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion.

[22]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Clinical Performance of Dental Implants with a Moderately Rough (TiUnite) Surface: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Clinical Studies. , 2017, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[23]  S. Bozkaya,et al.  The Comparison of Porous Titanium Granule and Xenograft in the Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis: A Prospective Clinical Study , 2017, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[24]  J. Prados-Frutos,et al.  Effects of Surface Treatment Modification and Implant Design in Implants Placed Crestal and Subcrestally Applying Delayed Loading Protocol , 2017, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[25]  M. Cicciu',et al.  Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis: A Current Understanding of Their Diagnosis, Clinical Implications, and a Report of Treatment Using a Combined Therapy Approach. , 2017, The Journal of oral implantology.

[26]  A. Sculean,et al.  Prevalence and Mechanisms of Peri-implant Diseases , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[27]  D. Zaffe,et al.  The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in‐vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  M. Dominiak,et al.  Assessment of Pain When Uncovering Implants with Er:YAG Laser or Scalpel for Second Stage Surgery. , 2016, Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University.

[29]  D. Anssari Moin,et al.  Reconstruction of Peri-implant Osseous Defects , 2016, Journal of dental research.

[30]  O. Ogle Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration. , 2015, Dental clinics of North America.

[31]  I. Polyzois,et al.  Risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis: a systematic literature review. , 2015, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  A. Barfeie,et al.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration , 2015, BDJ.

[33]  N. Bostanci,et al.  Peri-implant infections of oral biofilm etiology. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[34]  R. Sangur,et al.  Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications , 2014, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[35]  Carolyn M. Holmes,et al.  Is Laser Disinfection an Effective Adjunctive Treatment to Bone Augmentation for Peri-Implantitis? A Review of Current Evidence. , 2014, Clinical advances in periodontics.

[36]  S. Renvert,et al.  The incidence of peri-implantitis for two different implant systems over a period of thirteen years. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[37]  Mingyun Li,et al.  Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm , 2011, Virulence.

[38]  G. R. Persson,et al.  Treatment of peri-implantitis using an Er:YAG laser or an air-abrasive device: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[39]  A. Aoki,et al.  Er:YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a histological study , 2007, Lasers in Medical Science.

[40]  Min Zhao,et al.  Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-γ and PTEN , 2006, Nature.

[41]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Some soft tissue characteristics at implant abutments with different surface topography. A study in humans. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[42]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[43]  J. Henke,et al.  Peri-implant care of ailing implants with the carbon dioxide laser. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.