Do MRI Reports Contain Adequate Preoperative Staging Information for End Users to Make Appropriate Treatment Decisions for Rectal Cancer?

PurposeThis study was designed to elicit end-user opinions regarding the importance and diagnostic accuracy of MRI for T-category, threatened or involved circumferential margin (CRMi), and lymph node involvement (LNi) for preoperative staging of rectal cancer and to determine completeness of MRI reports for these elements on a population based level.MethodsThe first part of this study was a mailed survey of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists to elicit their opinions regarding the importance and diagnostic accuracy of T-category, CRMi, and LNi on MRI. The second part of the study was an audit of MRI reports issued for pre-operative staging of rectal cancer to assess the completeness of these reports for T-category, CRMi, and LNi.ResultsAlthough T-category, CRMi, and LNi were considered essential by 97, 94, and 77 % of respondents, respectively, the MRI report audit showed that only 40 % of MRI reports captured all of these elements. The majority of end users reported moderate diagnostic accuracy on MRI for T-category and CRMi and low diagnostic accuracy for LNi (52.3, 43, and 48.5 % respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that specialty was the only independent predictor of correct reporting of the diagnostic accuracy for each of the MRI elements.ConclusionsWhile end users consider T-category, CRMi and LNi essential for preoperative staging of rectal cancer, less than 40 % of MRI reports captured all of these elements. Therefore, strategies to improve communication between radiologists and end users are critical to improve the overall quality of care for rectal cancer patients.

[1]  Mariusz Pawlak,et al.  Quality of life, anorectal and sexual functions after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Rieken,et al.  [Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer]. , 2001, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[3]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[4]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[6]  R G Newcombe,et al.  The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[7]  A. Darzi,et al.  Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  L Fritschi,et al.  Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations , 2009, Pathology.

[10]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  Valdair Francisco Muglia,et al.  Radiological Reports: A Comparison between the Transmission Efficiency of Information in Free Text and in Structured Reports , 2010, Clinics.

[12]  R. Scolyer,et al.  The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma , 2007, Histopathology.

[13]  Stubbs Dm.  Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. , 1997 .

[14]  Y. Atomi,et al.  MRI diagnosis of mesorectal lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. what is the optimal criterion? , 2004, Anticancer research.

[15]  H. Putter,et al.  Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  G. Brown,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. , 2005, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[17]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  I R Daniels,et al.  MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  K. Bujko,et al.  Long‐term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short‐course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  Joseph Beyene,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category, Lymph Node Metastases, and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  A Hanbidge,et al.  Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[23]  Lars Påhlman,et al.  Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[24]  G. Hill,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer , 2000, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[25]  Rainer Fietkau,et al.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Potchen,et al.  Readability of the radiologic report. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[27]  H. Putter,et al.  The TME Trial After a Median Follow-up of 6 Years: Increased Local Control But No Survival Benefit in Irradiated Patients With Resectable Rectal Carcinoma , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[28]  R. Beets-Tan,et al.  MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin , 2003, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.