Working Memory Span and E-Learning: The Effect of Personalization Techniques on Learners' Performance

This research paper presents the positive effect of incorporating individuals' working memory (WM) span as a personalization factor in terms of improving users' academic performance in the context of adaptive educational hypermedia The psychological construct of WM is robustly related to information processing and learning, while there is a wide differentiation of WM span among individuals Hence, in an effort to examine the role of cognitive and affective factors in adaptive hypermedia along with psychometric user profiling considerations, WM has a central role in the authors' effort to develop a user information processing model Encouraged by previous findings, a larger scale study has been conducted with the participation of 230 university students in order to elucidate if it is possible through personalization to increase the performance of learners with lower levels of WM span According to the results, users with low WM performed better in the personalized condition, which involved segmentation of the web content and aesthetical annotation, while users with medium/high WM span were slightly negatively affected by the same techniques Therefore, it can by supported it is possible to specifically address the problem of low WM span with significant results.

[1]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  The Psychological Corporation , 1923, Science.

[3]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Sergio Escorial,et al.  Fluid intelligence, memory span, and temperament difficulties predict academic performance of young adolescents , 2007 .

[5]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance , 2008 .

[6]  George Spanoudis,et al.  The development of mental processing. , 2010 .

[7]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  M. Rinck,et al.  Multimedia learning: Working memory and the learning of word and picture diagrams , 2006 .

[9]  Paul Dan Cristea,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia System Interoperability: a 'real world' evaluation , 2007, J. Digit. Inf..

[10]  Paul Irwing,et al.  Sex differences in mental arithmetic, digit span, and g defined as working memory capacity , 2008 .

[11]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Personalizing the Interaction in a Web-based Educational Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[14]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Arthur: A personalized instructional system , 2002, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[15]  Curtis A. Carver,et al.  Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles , 1999 .

[16]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Working Memory Differences in E-Learning Environments: Optimization of Learners' Performance through Personalization , 2009, UMAP.

[17]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Capturing essential intrinsic user behaviour values for the design of comprehensive web-based personalized environments , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Robert W. Roeser,et al.  Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in science achievement and engagement: A person-centered analysis☆ , 2008 .

[19]  A. Baddeley The concept of working memory: A view of its current state and probable future development , 1981, Cognition.

[20]  R. Colom,et al.  Working memory and intelligence are highly related constructs, but why? , 2008 .

[21]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[22]  S McDonald,et al.  Disorientation in hypertext: the effects of three text structures on navigation performance. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  A. Demetriou,et al.  The development of mental processing: efficiency, working memory, and thinking. , 2002, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[24]  Johannes Naumann,et al.  Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext , 2008 .

[25]  R H Logie,et al.  Interference with visual short-term memory. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  An Experimental Assessment of the Use of Cognitive and Affective Factors in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[27]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[28]  T. Alloway Working Memory, but Not IQ, Predicts Subsequent Learning in Children with Learning Difficulties , 2009 .

[29]  K. Turley-Ames,et al.  Strategy training and working memory task performance. , 2003 .

[30]  Moon J. Lee,et al.  The effects of three different computer texts on readers' recall: based on working memory capacity , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Kenneth Thibodeau If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository , 2007, J. Digit. Inf..