Remembering kinds: New evidence that categories are privileged in children’s thinking

What are the representations and learning mechanisms that underlie conceptual development? The present research provides evidence in favor of the claim that this process is guided by an early-emerging predisposition to think and learn about abstract kinds. Specifically, three studies (N=192) demonstrated that 4- to 7-year-old children have better recall for novel information about kinds (e.g., that dogs catch a bug called "fep") than for similar information about individuals (e.g., that a particular dog catches a bug called "fep"). By showing that children are particularly likely to retain information about kinds, this work not only provides a first empirical demonstration of a phenomenon that may be key to conceptual development but also makes it apparent that young children's thinking is suffused with abstractions rather than being perceptually-based and concrete.

[1]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[2]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development , 2004 .

[3]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[4]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions: questions of mechanism. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[6]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Generic language and judgements about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central? , 2009, Language and cognitive processes.

[7]  M. Naus,et al.  Effects of the knowledge base on children's memory strategies. , 1985, Advances in child development and behavior.

[8]  D. M. Hall,et al.  Encoding and incidental memory in children , 1976 .

[9]  G. Diesendruck,et al.  Fifteen-month-old infants attend to shape over other perceptual properties in an induction task , 2010 .

[10]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Expressing generic concepts with and without a language model , 2005, Cognition.

[11]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Elizabeth A. Ware,et al.  Form follows function: Learning about function helps children learn about shape , 2010 .

[13]  V. Jaswal,et al.  Don't believe everything you hear: preschoolers' sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction. , 2004, Child development.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. , 2005, Psychological review.

[15]  Jon Star,et al.  Children's interpretation of generic noun phrases. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[16]  P. Bloom,et al.  How specific is the shape bias? , 2003, Child development.

[17]  M. Chi,et al.  Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. , 1983 .

[18]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Memory is More than just Remembering: Strategic Control of Encoding, Accessing Memory, and Making Decisions , 2007 .

[19]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[20]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[21]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  When Development and Learning Decrease Memory , 2004, Psychological science.

[23]  Cari S. Kilbreath,et al.  Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. , 2004, Child development.

[24]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[25]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Making Sense of Infant Categorization: Stable Processes and Changing Representations☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[26]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[27]  E. Markman,et al.  The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[28]  S. Gelman,et al.  This cat has nine lives? Children's memory for genericity in language. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[29]  S. Gelman,et al.  Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. , 2003, Child development.

[30]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  S. Gelman,et al.  Categories influence predictions about individual consistency. , 2008, Child development.

[33]  Amanda L. Woodward,et al.  Infants track action goals within and across agents , 2007, Cognition.

[34]  Noam Chomsky.  Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[35]  S. Waxman,et al.  Conceptual information permeates word learning in infancy. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[36]  S. Waxman,et al.  Word learning is ‘smart’: evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words , 2002, Cognition.

[37]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities. , 2012, Child development.

[38]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[39]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval. , 1994 .

[40]  E. Markman,et al.  Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. , 2012, Child development.

[41]  C. Martin,et al.  Children's gender-based reasoning about toys. , 1995, Child development.

[42]  S. Gelman,et al.  Acquisition of generic noun phrases in Chinese: learning about lions without an ‘-s’* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[43]  M. Chi.  Knowledge structures and memory development. , 1978 .

[44]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Do ducks lay eggs? How people interpret generic assertions , 2007 .

[45]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[46]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Global-Before-Basic Object Categorization in Connectionist Networks and 2-Month-Old Infants. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[47]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  S. Carey,et al.  Constraints on conceptual development: a case study of the acquisition of folkbiological and folksociological knowledge in Madagascar. , 2004, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[49]  B. Hayes,et al.  The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[50]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Information learned from generic language becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations , 2009, Cognition.

[51]  Preschoolers' use of morphosyntactic cues to identify generic sentences: indefinite singular noun phrases, tense, and aspect. , 2011, Child development.

[52]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Generics Are a Cognitive Default: Evidence From Sentence Processing , 2011, CogSci.

[53]  S. Gelman,et al.  Quantified statements are recalled as generics: Evidence from preschool children and adults , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  S. Gelman.  The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  David B. Mitchell,et al.  Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness , 1982 .

[56]  R. Baillargeon.  Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants. , 1987 .

[57]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  The Role of Words and Sounds in Infants' Visual Processing: From Overshadowing to Attentional Tuning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Fei Xu,et al.  Induction, Overhypothesis, and the Origin of Abstract Knowledge , 2010, Psychological science.

[59]  Holly Branigan,et al.  Syntactic Priming , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[60]  David F. Bjorklund,et al.  How age changes in knowledge base contribute to the development of children's memory: An interpretive review , 1987 .

[61]  G. Gergely,et al.  On pedagogy. , 2007, Developmental science.

[62]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide , 2009, Cognition.

[63]  R. Endsley,et al.  The effects of sex-Typed labeling on preschool children's information-Seeking and retention , 1983 .

[64]  Barbara W Sarnecka,et al.  Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations , 2008, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[65]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  When induction meets memory: evidence for gradual transition from similarity-based to category-based induction. , 2005, Child development.

[66]  Heidi Kloos,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article When Looks Are Everything Appearance Similarity Versus Kind Information in Early Induction , 2022 .

[67]  Twila Tardif,et al.  A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin , 1998, Cognition.

[68]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. , 1998, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[69]  S. Gelman.  Generics as a Window onto Young Children's Concepts , 2010 .

[70]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  From Perceptual Categories to Concepts: What Develops? , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[71]  Leila Behrens,et al.  Genericity from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 2005 .

[72]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[73]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect , 2011 .

[74]  R. Gelman.  First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate‐Inanimate Distinction as Examples , 1990 .

[75]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[76]  Marianne G. Taylor,et al.  Mother-child conversations about gender : understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs , 2004 .

[77]  L. Markson,et al.  The shape of thought. , 2008, Developmental science.

[78]  L. I. O'kelly,et al.  Retention of nonsense syllables learned under different degrees of motivation. , 1949, The Journal of psychology.

[79]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The effect of semantic similarity on retroactive interference in long- and short-term memory , 1966 .

[80]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. , 2001, Advances in child development and behavior.

[81]  Daniel Brickman,et al.  Preschoolers' Responses to Social Comparisons Involving Relative Failure , 2008, Psychological science.

[82]  J. Mandler,et al.  Drinking and driving don't mix: inductive generalization in infancy , 1996, Cognition.

[83]  Harry N. Seymour,et al.  Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular /s/ , 2005 .

[84]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[85]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Effects of Language and Similarity on Comparison Processing , 2009, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[86]  Mark Reiser,et al.  Understanding mother-adolescent conflict discussions: concurrent and across-time prediction from youths' dispositions and parenting. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[87]  Frederick A. Zehrer,et al.  Review of Verbal behavior. , 1959 .

[88]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Learning Words for Kinds: Generic Noun Phrases in Acquisition. , 2004 .

[89]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[90]  S. Waxman,et al.  Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[91]  D. Billman,et al.  Induction from a single instance: formation of a novel category. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[92]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Why are dunkels sticky? Preschoolers infer functionality and intentional creation for artifact properties learned from generic language , 2010, Cognition.

[93]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[94]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object categories: new evidence from 12-month-old infants , 2005, Cognition.

[95]  Susan A Gelman,et al.  A Developmental Analysis of Generic Nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua , 2010, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[96]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  First Principles Organize Attention to and Learning About Relevant Data: Number and the Animate-Inanimate Distinction as Examples , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[97]  B. Weiner,et al.  Motivational factors in short-term retention. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[98]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Developing object concepts in infancy: an associative learning perspective. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[99]  Amanda C. Brandone,et al.  Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences , 2010, Language and cognitive processes.

[100]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: simulations and data. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[101]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Generics: Cognition and Acquisition , 2008 .

[102]  G. Csibra,et al.  Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy , 2006 .

[103]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[104]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  An attentional learning account of the shape bias: reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[105]  Susan A Graham,et al.  Category Markers or Attributes , 2008, Psychological science.

[106]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  A blue cat or a cat that is blue? Evidence for abstract syntax in young children's noun phrases , 2005 .

[107]  Developing object concepts in infancy: An associative learning perspective: VI. Simulation 4: A model of Rakison, 2005a: Animacy relations in causal events. , 2008 .

[108]  Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children , 2008, Cognition.

[109]  K. Dewar,et al.  Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[110]  S. Gelman,et al.  Generic noun phrases in mother–child conversations , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[111]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[112]  Elizabeth A. Ware,et al.  Effects of generic language on category content and structure , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[113]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  GENERICS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE MIND , 2007 .

[114]  Jennifer M. D. Yoon,et al.  Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[115]  N. Goodman.  Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[116]  John M. Lawler,et al.  Studies in English generics , 1973 .

[117]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[118]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[119]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Social Evaluation by Preverbal Infants , 2008, Pediatric Research.

[120]  E. Markman,et al.  The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. , 2011, Child development.

[121]  Elizabeth F. Shipley,et al.  Categories, hierarchies, and induction , 1993 .

[122]  B. Weiner.  Effects of motivations on the availability and retrieval of memory traces. , 1966 .

[123]  R. Baillargeon.  Infants' Physical World , 2004 .

[124]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[125]  Marianne G. Taylor,et al.  Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs: I. Introduction. , 2004 .

[126]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: evidence from exploratory play. , 1993, Child development.

[127]  K. Dewar,et al.  Do Early Nouns Refer to Kinds or Distinct Shapes? , 2009, Psychological science.

[128]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal? , 2005, Psychological science.

[129]  S. Gelman,et al.  Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. , 1991, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[130]  E. Spelke,et al.  Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.

[131]  S. R. Schmidt.  Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[132]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[133]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[134]  S. Gelman,et al.  Two-year-olds use the generic/nongeneric distinction to guide their inferences about novel kinds. , 2011, Child development.