Performance analysis of nano-sat scale μCAT electric propulsion for 3U CubeSat attitude control

Abstract In recent years, the complexity of CubeSat missions has been increasing steadily as the platform capabilities have drastically improved. Missions involving high-accuracy pointing and interplanetary exploration are no longer out of the reach of CubeSat-class satellites. For fine-pointing, the currently available options are dominated by reaction-wheels. One promising alternative is the use of low-thrust propulsion systems for providing fine pointing capability. Electric propulsion systems will not have the high slew-rate of the reaction wheels or ΔV responsiveness of conventional thrusters. However, if the main objective of the mission is in providing high-accuracy pointing, long-term attitude stability, orbit maintenance, and long-term orbit maneuvers, then a multi-thruster electrical propulsion system can be substituted as the combined attitude control and propulsion system, resulting in volume and cost savings. This paper characterizes the performance of one such CubeSat attitude control system. First, the characterization results of a representative CubeSat-scale electric propulsion system, the μCAT vacuum arc thruster, are given. Using these performance parameters, the theoretical pointing accuracy and target dwell time are analyzed and discussed. The paper also highlights potential application of the electric propulsion system and provides comparison results of the system performance as compared to other commercially available units in terms of cost, volumetric efficiency, and resource consumption.

[1]  R. Tanberg,et al.  On the Cathode of an Arc Drawn in Vacuum , 1930 .

[2]  Jacek Kurzyna,et al.  Liquid micro pulsed plasma thruster , 2015 .

[3]  B. Juttner,et al.  Erosion Craters and Arc Cathode Spots in Vacuum , 1979 .

[4]  Anwar Ali,et al.  Design and comparison of different shapes Embedded Magnetorquers for CubeSat Standard Nanosatellites , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Computing, Electronic and Electrical Engineering (ICE Cube).

[5]  Tae W. Lim,et al.  Thruster Attitude Control System Design and Performance for Tactical Satellite 4 Maneuvers , 2014 .

[6]  M. Keidar,et al.  Optimization of discharge triggering in micro-cathode vacuum arc thruster for CubeSats , 2018, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[7]  Carsten A Scharlemann,et al.  Investigation of thrust mechanisms in a water fed pulsed plasma thruster , 2003 .

[8]  E. Oks,et al.  Ion velocities in vacuum arc plasmas , 2000 .

[9]  Mizutani,et al.  Erratum: Meson-exchange models for low-energy nucleon-antinucleon scattering , 1987, Physical Review D, Particles and fields.

[10]  John Ziemer,et al.  Performance Characterization of a High Efficiency Gas-Fed Pulsed Plasma Thruster* , 1997 .

[11]  William Yeong Liang Ling,et al.  Discharge characteristics of an ablative pulsed plasma thruster with non-volatile liquid propellant , 2017 .

[12]  Joshua Schoolcraft,et al.  MarCO: Interplanetary Mission Development on a CubeSat Scale , 2016 .

[13]  Hiroyuki Koizumi,et al.  The technological and commercial expansion of electric propulsion , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[14]  Rodney L. Burton,et al.  Pulsed Plasma Thrusters , 2010 .

[15]  Michael Keidar,et al.  Plasma Engineering: Applications from Aerospace to Bio and Nanotechnology , 2013 .

[16]  Bong Wie,et al.  Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control , 1998 .

[17]  Eric Caillibot,et al.  Canadian advanced nanospace experiment 2: Scientific and technological innovation on a three-kilogram satellite , 2006 .

[18]  George Teel,et al.  Thruster Subsystem for the United States Naval Academy's (USNA) Ballistically Reinforced Communication Satellite (BRICSat-P) , 2016 .

[19]  Jonathan Kolbeck,et al.  Micro-propulsion based on vacuum arcs , 2019, Journal of Applied Physics.

[20]  Michael Keidar,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Micro-cathode Arc Thruster , 2014 .

[21]  Shinichi Nakasuka,et al.  Technology demonstration on University of Tokyo's pico-satellite “XI-V” and its effective operation result using ground station network , 2007 .

[22]  Maurice Borgeaud,et al.  SwissCube: The First Entirely-Built Swiss Student Satellite with an Earth Observation Payload , 2010 .

[23]  Alessandro Golkar,et al.  CubeSat evolution: Analyzing CubeSat capabilities for conducting science missions , 2017 .

[24]  Michael Keidar,et al.  Magnetically enhanced vacuum arc thruster , 2005 .

[25]  M. Keidar,et al.  Improvement of Microcathode Arc Thruster Lifetime by Deposition of Boron-Containing Coating , 2020 .

[26]  David Krejci,et al.  A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation , 2012 .

[27]  Kristina M. Lemmer,et al.  Propulsion for CubeSats , 2017 .

[28]  Gregory G. Spanjers,et al.  Propellant charring in pulsed plasma thrusters , 2004 .

[29]  Peter Shaw,et al.  Pulsed Plasma Thrusters for Small Satellites , 2011 .

[30]  David Gerhardt Passive Magnetic Attitude Control for CubeSat Spacecraft , 2010 .

[31]  Paolo Massioni,et al.  Magnetorquer Based Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite Testplatform , 2010 .

[32]  Jurg Zwahlen,et al.  Maturation of Iodine Fueled BIT-3 RF Ion Thruster and RF Neutralizer , 2016 .

[33]  Sanjay Jayaram,et al.  Model-based Simulation of Passive Attitude Control of SLUCUBE-2 Using Nonlinear Hysteresis and Geomagnetic Models , 2012 .

[34]  Ming Tan,et al.  BioSentinel: Monitoring DNA Damage Repair Beyond Low Earth Orbit on a 6U Nanosatellite , 2014 .

[35]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space mission engineering : the new SMAD , 2011 .

[36]  Edgar Y. Choueiri System Optimization of Ablative Pulsed Plasma Thrusters for Stationkeeping , 1996 .

[37]  David A. Paige,et al.  Lunar Flashlight: Exploration and Science at the Moon with a 6U CubeSat , 2015 .