Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models.

Mixing models are statistical tools that use biotracers to probabilistically estimate the contribution of multiple sources to a mixture. These biotracers may include contaminants, fatty acids, or stable isotopes, the latter of which are widely used in trophic ecology to estimate the mixed diet of consumers. Bayesian implementations of mixing models using stable isotopes (e.g., MixSIR, SIAR) are regularly used by ecologists for this purpose, but basic questions remain about when each is most appropriate. In this study, we describe the structural differences between common mixing model error formulations in terms of their assumptions about the predation process. We then introduce a new parameterization that unifies these mixing model error structures, as well as implicitly estimates the rate at which consumers sample from source populations (i.e., consumption rate). Using simulations and previously published mixing model datasets, we demonstrate that the new error parameterization outperforms existing models and provides an estimate of consumption. Our results suggest that the error structure introduced here will improve future mixing model estimates of animal diet.

[1]  C. Field,et al.  QUANTITATIVE FATTY ACID SIGNATURE ANALYSIS: A NEW METHOD OF ESTIMATING PREDATOR DIETS , 2004 .

[2]  B. Fry,et al.  Rapid 13C/12C turnover during growth of brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) , 1982, Oecologia.

[3]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  Resource polygon geometry predicts Bayesian stable isotope mixing model bias , 2014 .

[4]  Eric J Ward,et al.  Improving Bayesian isotope mixing models: a response to Jackson et al. (2009). , 2009, Ecology letters.

[5]  A. Bond,et al.  Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[7]  A. C. James,et al.  On the Use of Stable Isotopes in Trophic Ecology , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher L. Dutton,et al.  A novel sediment fingerprinting method using filtration: application to the Mara River, East Africa , 2013, Journal of Soils and Sediments.

[9]  Andrew L Jackson,et al.  Erroneous behaviour of MixSIR, a recently published Bayesian isotope mixing model: a discussion of Moore & Semmens (2008). , 2009, Ecology letters.

[10]  A. W. Galloway,et al.  Diet-specific biomarkers show that high-quality phytoplankton fuels herbivorous zooplankton in large boreal lakes , 2014 .

[11]  C. Donlan,et al.  Coupling stable isotopes with bioenergetics to estimate interspecific interactions. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  R. B. Root The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher , 1967 .

[13]  Kiona Ogle,et al.  Beyond simple linear mixing models: process-based isotope partitioning of ecological processes. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  E. Hyslop Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application , 1980 .

[15]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Donald L. Phillips,et al.  Mangrove-Exported Nutrient Incorporation by Sessile Coral Reef Invertebrates , 2009, Ecosystems.

[17]  D. Phillips,et al.  Bayesian stable isotope mixing models , 2012, 1209.6457.

[18]  Sora L. Kim,et al.  Using Stable Isotope Analysis to Understand the Migration and Trophic Ecology of Northeastern Pacific White Sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  Quantitative estimates of isopod resource utilization using a Bayesian fatty acid mixing model , 2014 .

[20]  D. Phillips,et al.  Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources , 2003, Oecologia.

[21]  Brice X Semmens,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[22]  E. Angulo,et al.  Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction , 2009 .

[23]  Richard Inger,et al.  Source Partitioning Using Stable Isotopes: Coping with Too Much Variation , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  Chris T. Darimont,et al.  Quantifying Inter- and Intra-Population Niche Variability Using Hierarchical Bayesian Stable Isotope Mixing Models , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  M. Gibbs Identifying Source Soils in Contemporary Estuarine Sediments: A New Compound-Specific Isotope Method , 2008 .

[26]  Gerard Govers,et al.  A mixing model to incorporate uncertainty in sediment fingerprinting , 2014 .

[27]  G. B. Kolenosky Wolf Predation on Wintering Deer in East-Central Ontario , 1972 .

[28]  William H. Blake,et al.  Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments , 2012 .