Comparison of scoliosis measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vectors and conventional two-dimensional measurements: advantages in evaluation of prognosis and surgical results

PurposeA new concept of vertebra vectors based on spinal three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of images from the EOS system, a new low-dose X-ray imaging device, was recently proposed to facilitate interpretation of EOS 3D data, especially with regard to horizontal plane images. This retrospective study was aimed at the evaluation of the spinal layout visualized by EOS 3D and vertebra vectors before and after surgical correction, the comparison of scoliotic spine measurement values based on 3D vertebra vectors with measurements using conventional two-dimensional (2D) methods, and an evaluation of horizontal plane vector parameters for their relationship with the magnitude of scoliotic deformity.Methods95 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis operated according to the Cotrel-Dubousset principle were subjected to EOS X-ray examinations pre- and postoperatively, followed by 3D reconstructions and generation of vertebra vectors in a calibrated coordinate system to calculate vector coordinates and parameters, as published earlier. Differences in values of conventional 2D Cobb methods and methods based on vertebra vectors were evaluated by means comparison T test and relationship of corresponding parameters was analysed by bivariate correlation. Relationship of horizontal plane vector parameters with the magnitude of scoliotic deformities and results of surgical correction were analysed by Pearson correlation and linear regression.ResultsIn comparison to manual 2D methods, a very close relationship was detectable in vertebra vector-based curvature data for coronal curves (preop r 0.950, postop r 0.935) and thoracic kyphosis (preop r 0.893, postop r 0.896), while the found small difference in L1–L5 lordosis values (preop r 0.763, postop r 0.809) was shown to be strongly related to the magnitude of corresponding L5 wedge. The correlation analysis results revealed strong correlation between the magnitude of scoliosis and the lateral translation of apical vertebra in horizontal plane. The horizontal plane coordinates of the terminal and initial points of apical vertebra vectors represent this (r 0.701; r 0.667). Less strong correlation was detected in the axial rotation of apical vertebras and the magnitudes of the frontal curves (r 0.459).ConclusionsVertebra vectors provide a key opportunity to visualize spinal deformities in all three planes simultaneously. Measurement methods based on vertebral vectors proved to be just as accurate and reliable as conventional measurement methods for coronal and sagittal plane parameters. In addition, the horizontal plane display of the curves can be studied using the same vertebra vectors. Based on the vertebra vectors data, during the surgical treatment of spinal deformities, the diminution of the lateral translation of the vertebras seems to be more important in the results of the surgical correction than the correction of the axial rotation.

[1]  D Mitton,et al.  A Biplanar Reconstruction Method Based on 2D and 3D Contours: Application to the Distal Femur , 2003, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  M. Steinlechner,et al.  Measurement of vertebral rotation: a comparison of two methods based on CT scans. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[3]  S Aaro,et al.  Estimation of Vertebral Rotation and the Spinal and Rib Cage Deformity in Scoliosis by Computer Tomography , 1981, Spine.

[4]  W. Skalli,et al.  Le système EOS. Nouvelle imagerie Ostéo-Articulaire basse dose en position debout , 2005 .

[5]  A. Ferguson,et al.  THE STUDY AND TREATMENT OF SCOLIOSIS , 1930 .

[6]  Tamás Illés,et al.  Breakthrough in three-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis: significance of horizontal plane view and vertebra vectors , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[7]  Cobb,et al.  Outlines for the study of scoliosis , 1948 .

[8]  David Mitton,et al.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Segmental Analysis of Scoliosis Corrected by the In Situ Contouring Technique , 2003, Spine.

[9]  J. D’Astous,et al.  Measurement of Spinal Kyphosis: Implications for the Management of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis , 2002, Spine.

[10]  G. Charpak La détection des particules , 1981 .

[11]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis According to the Coronal Curve Type , 2003, Spine.

[12]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Basic biomechanics of the spine. , 1980, Neurosurgery.

[13]  R Perdriolle,et al.  Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[14]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Reliability of Centroid, Cobb, and Harrison Posterior Tangent Methods: Which to Choose for Analysis of Thoracic Kyphosis , 2001, Spine.

[15]  J. Sevastik,et al.  Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[16]  J Dubousset,et al.  Analysis of Idiopathic Scoliosis Progression by Using Numerical Simulation , 2010, Spine.

[17]  E. Karlsson The Nobel Prize in Physics , 2001 .

[18]  Gali Dar,et al.  Vertebral body shape variation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: Characterization of its asymmetry and wedging , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  D. Polly,et al.  Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Technique Variability , 1996, Spine.

[20]  Catherine Adamsbaum,et al.  Evaluation of a new low-dose digital X-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children , 1998, Pediatric Radiology.

[21]  Wen-Ko Chiou,et al.  An alternative method for measuring scoliosis curvature. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[22]  J C Leong,et al.  New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. , 1993, Spine.

[23]  J. Cauley,et al.  Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: Inter-rater Reliability, Minimum Detectable Change and Longitudinal Variation , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[24]  R ROAF,et al.  Rotation movements of the spine with special reference to scoliosis. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  H. Ömeroğlu,et al.  Measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis using the Perdriolle torsionmeter: a clinical study on intraobserver and interobserver error , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[26]  M. Mehta Radiographic estimation of vertebral rotation in scoliosis. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  Georges Charpak,et al.  Une nouvelle imagerie Ostéo-Articulaire basse dose en position debout : le système EOS , 2005 .

[28]  C. L. Nash,et al.  A study of vertebral rotation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  Boštjan Likar,et al.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[30]  I. Stokes Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[31]  D Mitton,et al.  3D detailed reconstruction of vertebrae with low dose digital stereoradiography. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[32]  A Greenspan,et al.  Scoliotic index: a comparative evaluation of methods for the measurement of scoliosis. , 1978, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases.

[33]  V. Deviren,et al.  Measurement of Vertebral Rotation in Standing Versus Supine Position in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[34]  S. Göçen,et al.  Evaluation of computed tomographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an intraobserver and interobserver analysis. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[35]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Reliability of 3D Reconstruction of the Spine of Mild Scoliotic Patients , 2007, Spine.

[36]  F Lavaste,et al.  Quantification of Three-Dimensional Vertebral Rotations in Scoliosis: What Are the True Values? , 1995, Spine.