Generation of a Highly Specific Monoclonal Anti-Infliximab Antibody for Harmonization of TNF-Coated Infliximab Assays

Background: Determination of infliximab (IFX) serum concentrations has been used for treatment optimization of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A wide range of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) exists to quantitate IFX. Most of these assays lack specificity and cross-react with other anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. The ability of these IFX assays to detect IFX in complex with antidrug antibodies is not known. The objective of our study was to develop an IFX-specific immunoassay to monitor IFX serum concentrations and to evaluate the impact of antidrug antibodies on the assay performance. Methods: A panel of monoclonal antibodies toward IFX (MA-IFX) was generated by hybridoma technology and evaluated to replace the polyclonal antibody in a TNF-coated IFX assay. The selected monoclonal antibody–based (MA-based) IFX ELISA was benchmarked to a clinically validated, reference polyclonal antibody–based (pAb-based) IFX ELISA using 209 inflammatory bowel disease serum samples. Results: Fifty-five MA-IFX were generated and grouped into 9 clusters. Of the 22 monoclonal antibodies tested, MA-IFX6B7 was selected for use in the IFX ELISA and the assay was further optimized. MA-IFX6B7 is a high-affinity (KD = 1.40E-09 mol/L), noninhibitory IgG1 antibody that binds to the Fab fragment of IFX and exhibits no cross-reactivity with other anti-TNF drugs. The linearity of an IFX dose–response curve was demonstrated in the range of 1.2–37.5 ng/mL (R2 = 0.988). The MA-based assay showed a good Pearson correlation (R = 0.986) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.985) with the pAb-based assay. The MA-based assay detects IFX in complex with nonneutralizing anti-IFX antibodies but not when complexed with neutralizing anti-IFX antibodies. Conclusions: In this study, a highly specific MA-IFX was developed as detection antibody in an ELISA to quantify IFX serum concentrations. The assay was benchmarked to the clinically validated reference pAb-based IFX ELISA.

[1]  L. A. Christensen,et al.  Individualised therapy is more cost-effective than dose intensification in patients with Crohn’s disease who lose response to anti-TNF treatment: a randomised, controlled trial , 2013, Gut.

[2]  Ann Gils,et al.  OP11 Individualised infliximab treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring: A prospective controlled Trough level Adapted infliXImab Treatment (TAXIT) trial , 2012 .

[3]  S. Vermeire,et al.  Detection of infliximab levels and anti‐infliximab antibodies: a comparison of three different assays , 2012, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  M. Silverberg,et al.  Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[5]  C. Milstein,et al.  [1] Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: Strategies and procedures , 1981 .

[6]  S. Ben-Horin,et al.  Review article: loss of response to anti‐TNF treatments in Crohn’s disease , 2011, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  S. Hanauer,et al.  Assessing Response and Loss of Response to Biological Therapies in IBD , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[8]  C. Milstein,et al.  Preparation of monoclonal antibodies: strategies and procedures. , 1981, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  A. Cheifetz,et al.  Impact of Antibodies to Infliximab on Clinical Outcomes and Serum Infliximab Levels in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Meta-Analysis , 2013, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[10]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  Switch to adalimumab in patients with Crohn's disease controlled by maintenance infliximab: prospective randomised SWITCH trial , 2011, Gut.

[11]  M. Silverberg,et al.  Trough serum infliximab: a predictive factor of clinical outcome for infliximab treatment in acute ulcerative colitis , 2009, Gut.

[12]  S. Vermeire,et al.  Report of the ECCO pathogenesis workshop on anti-TNF therapy failures in inflammatory bowel diseases: definitions, frequency and pharmacological aspects. , 2010, Journal of Crohn's & colitis.

[13]  G Van Assche,et al.  Early serial trough and antidrug antibody level measurements predict clinical outcome of infliximab and adalimumab treatment , 2011, Gut.

[14]  C. Wagner,et al.  Formation, Distribution, and Elimination of Infliximab and Anti-Infliximab Immune Complexes in Cynomolgus Monkeys , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[15]  T. Klausen,et al.  Comparison of Techniques for Monitoring Infliximab and Antibodies Against Infliximab in Crohn's Disease , 2013, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[16]  Dietmar Stöckl,et al.  Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  Paul Rutgeerts,et al.  Biological therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[18]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  1159 Results on the Optimisation Phase of the Prospective Controlled Trough Level Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) Trial , 2012 .

[19]  A. Gils,et al.  Importance of the Hinge Region between α-Helix F and the Main Part of Serpins, Based upon Identification of the Epitope of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1 Neutralizing Antibodies* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Els Brouwers,et al.  Development of a Universal Anti-Adalimumab Antibody Standard for Interlaboratory Harmonization , 2014, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[21]  P. Nakane,et al.  PEROXIDASE-LABELED ANTIBODY A NEW METHOD OF CONJUGATION , 1974, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.