Bottom-up digital soil mapping. I. Soil layer classes

Great advances have been made in quantitative soil classification and mapping in the past few decades, and these have enabled the development of continuous soil classes that are not necessarily mutually exclusive. This is a more natural a better representation of the nature of the soil continuum than the traditional mutually-exclusive soil classes. Attempts at continuous soil classification have–perhaps subconsciously–used bottom-up classification techniques that are based on the quantification of similarity between soil profiles. Approaches that use fuzzy clustering techniques are a good example of this. The intention of this work is to draw attention to continuous bottom-up soil classification in its own right, rather than just as a means to an end as has often been the case in previous digital soil mapping exercises. Our efforts are invested in developing a bottom-up soil classification system, and we begin in Part I of this paper by developing a set of continuous soil layer classes. We created a set of continuous soil classes based on measured soil properties and soil properties estimated using soil mid-infrared spectra. The soil layers came from a set of 262 soil profiles sampled from a study area in the lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales, Australia. A fuzzy k-means clustering algorithm was used to carry out the cluster analysis. The results of the cluster analysis suggested that 7 layer classes were optimal for our soil layers. Each observed soil layer was allocated to the continuous layer class to which it had the highest membership value. The confusion index for the soil layers tended to be low which gave confidence in the effectiveness of the continuous classification system.

[1]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[2]  B. Minasny,et al.  Bottom-up digital soil mapping. II. Soil series classes , 2011 .

[3]  M. Roubens Fuzzy clustering algorithms and their cluster validity , 1982 .

[4]  A. McBratney,et al.  A continuum approach to soil classification by modified fuzzy k‐means with extragrades , 1992 .

[5]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[6]  R. Isbell Australian Soil Classification , 1996 .

[7]  James G. Bockheim,et al.  Historical development of key concepts in pedology , 2005 .

[8]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[9]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Gerardo Beni,et al.  A Validity Measure for Fuzzy Clustering , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines , 1999 .

[12]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties , 2006 .

[13]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future , 2001 .

[14]  R. Webster,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIONS TO THE 7TH APPROXIMATION , 1968 .

[15]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Empirical estimates of uncertainty for mapping continuous depth functions of soil attributes , 2011 .

[16]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  A. Cass,et al.  Effect of soil properties on vine performance. , 2004 .

[18]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  High-resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  John Triantafilis,et al.  Creation and Interpolation of Continuous Soil Layer Classes in the Lower Namoi Valley , 2001 .

[20]  J. Walker,et al.  Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook , 1984 .

[21]  Gan Zhang,et al.  Numerical Approaches to Identification of Characteristic Soil Layers in an Urban Environment , 2008 .

[22]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Soil Classification : A Global Desk Reference , 2002 .

[23]  Na Campbell,et al.  Numerical classification of soil profiles on the basis of field morphological properties , 1970 .

[24]  A. C. Orvedal,et al.  General Principles of Technical Grouping of Soils1 , 1942 .

[25]  L. Janik,et al.  Can mid infrared diffuse reflectance analysis replace soil extractions , 1998 .

[26]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[27]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[28]  P. Mahalanobis On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[29]  N. McKenzie,et al.  Demands on Soil Classification in Australia , 2002 .

[30]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries , 1997 .

[31]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity , 2009 .

[32]  R. Simonson,et al.  LESSONS FROM THE FIRST HALF CENTURY OF SOIL SURVEY: II. MAPPING OF SOILS , 1952 .