Computer-Assisted Fracture Reduction of Pelvic Ring Fractures: An In Vitro Study

A newly developed software module for computer-assisted surgery based on a commercially available navigation system allows simultaneous, independent registration of two fragments and real-time navigation of both fragments while reduction occurs. To evaluate the accuracy three fracture models were used: geometric foam blocks, a pelvic ring injury with disruption of the symphysis and the sacroiliac joint, and a pelvic ring fracture with symphysis disruption and a transforaminal sacral fracture. One examiner did visual and navigated reduction and in all experiments the end point was defined as anatomic reduction. Residual displacement was measured with a magnetic motion tracking device. The results revealed a significantly increased residual displacement with navigated reduction compared with visual control. The differences were low, averaging 1 mm for residual translation and 0.7° for the residual rotation, respectively. Residual displacement was small in both set-ups and may not be clinically relevant. Additional development of the software prototype with integration of surface registration may lead to improved handling and facilitated multifragment tracking. Use in the clinical setting should be possible within a short time.

[1]  H. Matsuzaki,et al.  Problems and Solutions of Pedicle Screw Plate Fixation of Lumbar Spine , 1990, Spine.

[2]  F Langlotz,et al.  The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[3]  S. Gumina,et al.  Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. , 1999, Spine.

[4]  T. Laine,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[5]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[6]  P. Tornetta,et al.  Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  Fabrice Chassat,et al.  Experimental Protocol for Accuracy Evaluation of 6-d Localizers for Computer-Integrated Surgery: Application to Four Optical Localizers , 1998, MICCAI.

[8]  P. Papagelopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  J. Matta Fractures of the Acetabulum: Accuracy of Reduction and Clinical Results in Patients Managed Operatively within Three Weeks after the Injury* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  W. Mills,et al.  Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  P. Duwelius,et al.  Computed Tomography‐Guided Fixation of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruptions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  P Merloz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  H Labelle,et al.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. , 2000, Spine.

[14]  F Langlotz,et al.  Computer Assistance for Pelvic Osteotomies , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[16]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted spine surgery: a technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3-D optical localizer. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[17]  F Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[18]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.