The performance of tele-cervicography for detection of preinvasive and invasive disease of the uterine cervix as an adjunctive test to Pap smears

Aim of the study To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of tele-cervicography for the detection of cervical neoplasia as an adjunctive test with Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. Material and methods Pap smear and tele-cervicography were performed on each subject. Histologic results were obtained for all patients. Results Of the 863 females who had a tele-cervigram, 252 (29.2%) had a positive result. Of the 60 histologically confirmed cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), 56 (93.3%) were detected by tele-cervicography, including 16 (26.7%) with a positive grade of 1 and 40 (66.7%) with a positive grade of 2. With the positive threshold of tele-cervicography set as any positive grade (P0 to P3), the overall sensitivity was 94.0% (95% CI: 88.0–97.3%), the specificity was 80.9% (95% CI: 80.0–81.5%), and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.94 (95% CI: 4.23–5.77) for the detection of HSILs or cancer. The combination of tele-cervicography with Pap smear testing for the detection of HSILs or cancer resulted in an increase in sensitivity from 84.6% (Pap only: cutoff = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more severe) to 98.3% (Pap plus tele-cervicography: cutoff = P0 or more severe). Conclusions The sensitivity of tele-cervicography was higher than that of cytology for the detection of cervical neoplasia, and combining the two tests increased the sensitivity. Tele-cervicography can be considered a useful complementary tool to cytology.

[1]  G C Burke,et al.  The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[2]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature. , 1998, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[3]  Evan R. Myers,et al.  Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow‐up of Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities: A Systematic Review , 2001 .

[4]  John Attia,et al.  Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests , 2003 .

[5]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Cervical cancer screening with cervicography and cytology. , 1995, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening , 2006 .

[7]  Daron G Ferris,et al.  Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  H. Cronjé,et al.  Screening for cervical neoplasia in a developing country utilizing cytology, cervicography and the acetic acid test , 2001, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  C. Oral,et al.  Spin Angular Momentum in Human Walking : Magnitude , Dimensionality and Distribution , 2006 .

[10]  Yvonne C Collins,et al.  Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  M. Temmerman,et al.  Comparison of pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus DNA‐PCR testing and cervicography , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[12]  R. Bashshur On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  L. Mango,et al.  Cervicography screening for cervical cancer among 8460 women in a high-risk population. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  D. Hertens,et al.  A multicentre study comparing cervicography and cytology in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  G. Parham,et al.  A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia in a developing country. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  A. Štafl,et al.  Cervicography: a new method for cervical cancer detection. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  N. Rocha,et al.  [Digital cervicography criteria: improving sensitivity in uterine cervical cancer diagnosis]. , 2008, Cadernos de saude publica.

[19]  A. Schneider,et al.  Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: validity of cytologic study, cervicography, and human papillomavirus detection. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  T. Wright,et al.  Evaluation of alternative methods of cervical cancer screening for resource‐poor settings , 2000, Cancer.