Whose and what futures? Navigating the contested coproduction of Thailand’s energy sociotechnical imaginaries

Abstract The futures of energy in developing countries need to be catalyzed, created, and nurtured in a process hinged towards achieving the ambitions of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement. This paper looks at how Thailand produces this normative energy future. Using the STS concept of sociotechnical imaginaries and empirical evidence gathered through interviews and document analysis, this paper critically engages, describes, and compares the dominant and resistant imaginaries in the ongoing production of Thailand’s energy future. I highlight three core imaginaries and describe how they intertwine with political economy, are determined by value sets and value systems, and present either visions of continuity or transformation. The dominance and/or marginalization of an imaginary, it appears, are contingent upon issues of power and resources. This entails that the production of energy futures in Thailand and beyond would be an ongoing process intertwining with heterogeneous actors and institutions, their value systems, interests and politics. Understanding these tensions and allowing alternative imaginaries to permeate policy-setting processes would be key in delivering a coherent and effective public policy.

[1]  Y. Fatimah Fantasy, values, and identity in biofuel innovation: Examining the promise of Jatropha for Indonesia , 2015 .

[2]  D. Mcadam,et al.  A Theory of Fields , 2012 .

[3]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Building from the Outside In: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Civil Society in New Order Indonesia , 2015 .

[4]  Eli Elinoff Sufficient Citizens: Moderation and the Politics of Sustainable Development in Thailand , 2014 .

[5]  John Grin,et al.  Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability , 2007 .

[6]  J. Dryzek,et al.  Climate-Challenged Society , 2013 .

[7]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[8]  J. Meadowcroft What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[9]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[10]  Sarah Hitchner,et al.  Envisioning and implementing wood-based bioenergy systems in the southern United States: Imaginaries in everyday talk , 2017 .

[11]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[12]  S. Tongsopit,et al.  An assessment of Thailand's feed-in tariff program , 2013 .

[13]  P. Bourdieu The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[14]  Anna Bruce,et al.  The future of Community Renewable Energy for electricity access in rural Central America , 2017 .

[15]  L. Busch,et al.  Bioenergy futures: framing sociotechnical imaginaries in local places. , 2014 .

[16]  Mark Diesendorf,et al.  Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark , 2017 .

[17]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity , 2015 .

[18]  M. Diesendorf,et al.  Strengthening the climate action movement: strategies from contemporary social action campaigns , 2016 .

[19]  Andreas Malm China as Chimney of the World , 2012 .

[20]  Matthew T. Huber,et al.  Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production , 2009 .

[21]  S. Tongsopit,et al.  Thailand's feed-in tariff for residential rooftop solar PV systems: Progress so far , 2015 .

[22]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Competing Dimensions of Energy Security: An International Perspective , 2009 .

[23]  Matthew J. Burke,et al.  Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review , 2017 .

[24]  M. Howlett,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems , 1996 .

[25]  M. Diesendorf,et al.  Strengthening the climate action movement: 
strategies from histories , 2014, Carbon Management.

[26]  Abraham S. D. Tidwell,et al.  The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American West , 2016, Social studies of science.

[27]  E. Ostrom Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change , 2010 .

[28]  A. Stahel Value from a complex dynamic system's perspective , 2005 .

[29]  Michael K. Connors When the Walls Come Crumbling Down: The Monarchy and Thai-style Democracy , 2011 .

[30]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Towards pragmatic narratives of societal engagement in the UK energy system , 2017 .

[31]  Dominic Boyer Energopolitics and the Anthropology of Energy , 2011 .

[32]  A. Stirling Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices , 2014 .

[33]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance , 2011 .

[34]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Imagined and Invented Worlds , 2015 .

[35]  N. Klenk,et al.  Discourses of carbon neutrality and imaginaries of urban futures , 2017 .

[36]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[37]  Mattijs Smits Southeast Asian Energy Transitions: Between Modernity and Sustainability , 2015 .

[38]  Conor Harrison The historical–geographical construction of power: electricity in Eastern North Carolina , 2013 .

[39]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Who is in Charge here? Governance for Sustainable Development in a Complex World* , 2007 .

[40]  D. Ockwell,et al.  Sustainable Energy for All: Innovation, technology and pro-poor green transformations , 2016 .

[41]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance , 2017 .

[42]  Anthony C. Janetos,et al.  Cosmopolitan, dynamic, and contested energy futures: Navigating the pluralities and polarities in the energy systems of tomorrow , 2017 .

[43]  Laurence L. Delina Accelerating Sustainable Energy Transition(s) in Developing Countries: The Challenges of Climate Change and Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[44]  K. Hewison,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Thailand’s Politics , 2016 .

[45]  G. Aiken Community Transitions to Low Carbon Futures in the Transition Towns Network (TTN) , 2012 .

[46]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[47]  J. Dryzek Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[48]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .