Proliferation Resistance Assessment Methodology for Nuclear Fuel Cycles

A methodology, based on the multiattribute utility analysis, for the assessment of diverse fuel cycles for proliferation resistance was developed. This methodology is intended to allow for the assessment of the effectiveness of safeguards implementation at facilities within a large-scale fuel cycle and allow for the ability to choose technologies based in part on their effectiveness to deter the proliferation of nuclear materials. Fuel cycle facilities under consideration include nuclear reactors, reprocessing facilities, fuel storage facilities, enrichment plants, fuel fabrication plants, uranium conversion plants, and uranium mining and milling operations. The method uses a series of attributes (for example, Department of Energy attractiveness level, weight fraction of even Pu isotopes, measurement uncertainty, etc.) to determine a proliferation resistance measure for each step in a process flow sheet. Each of the attributes has a weighting that determines its importance in the overall assessment. Each attribute also has an associated utility function derived from both expert knowledge and physical characteristics that relates changes in the value of the attribute to its overall effect on the proliferation resistance measure. A method for aggregating proliferation resistance values for each process in a flow sheet into an overall nuclear security measure for the complete cycle was also developed. This method is focused on preventing host nation diversion; however, a similar technique could be used to analyze the risk due to theft by an insider or outsider. This methodology has been applied successfully for example fuel cycles to demonstrate its viability as an assessment methodology and its capability in discriminating diverse fuel cycle options.

[1]  A. A. Husseiny,et al.  Risk assessment of alternative proliferation routes , 1982 .

[2]  Freddie J. Davis,et al.  Decision analysis for the selection of tank waste retrieval technology , 2000 .

[3]  R. N. Schock,et al.  A Strategic Framework for Proliferation Resistance: A systematic Approach for the Identification and Evaluation of Technology Opportunities to Enhance the Proliferation Resistance of Civilian Nuclear Energy Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Edwin Brown Firmage,et al.  The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons , 1969 .

[5]  P. Silvennoinen,et al.  An Approach to Quantitative Assessment of Relative Proliferation Risks from Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 1981 .

[6]  R. S. Strait,et al.  Proliferation resistance criteria for fissile material disposition , 1995 .

[7]  Matthew G. Bunn,et al.  Management and disposition of excess weapons plutonium , 1994 .

[8]  Jack S. Krohmer,et al.  Introduction to Health Physics , 1969 .

[9]  Carolyn D. Heising,et al.  A comparative assessment of the economics and proliferation resistance of advanced nuclear energy systems , 1980 .

[10]  R. Mulder A methodology for the analysis and selection of alternatives for the disposition of surplus plutonium. Quarterly technical progress report, April 1, 1995--June 30, 1995 , 1995 .

[11]  R L Keeney,et al.  A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Eriko Kiriyama,et al.  Non-proliferation criteria for nuclear fuel cycle options , 2000 .

[13]  P. Silvennoinen,et al.  Quantifying relative proliferation risks from nuclear fuel cycles , 1986 .

[14]  A. Croff ORIGEN2: A Versatile Computer Code for Calculating the Nuclide Compositions and Characteristics of Nuclear Materials , 1983 .

[15]  E. Kuhn,et al.  International Target Values 2000 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Materials. , 2002 .

[16]  Harold A. Feiveson Proliferation Resistant Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 1978 .

[17]  Myung Seung Yang,et al.  Electrical circuit model for quantifying the proliferation resistance of nuclear fuel cycles , 2000 .

[18]  Robert Hill,et al.  Nonproliferation and safeguards aspects of the IFR , 1997 .

[19]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[20]  D. A. Rutherford,et al.  Fissile material proliferation risk , 1996 .