The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models

The resistivity of bone is the most variable of all the tissues in the human body, ranging from 312 Ω cm to 84,745 Ω cm. Volume conduction models of cochlear implants have generally used a resistivity value of 641 Ω cm for the bone surrounding the cochlea. This study investigated the effect that bone resistivity has on modelled neural thresholds and intracochlear potentials using user-specific volume conduction models of implanted cochleae applying monopolar stimulation. The complexity of the description of the head volume enveloping the cochlea was varied between a simple infinite bone volume and a detailed skull containing a brain volume, scalp and accurate return electrode position. It was found that, depending on the structure of the head model and implementation of the return electrode, different bone resistivity values are necessary to match model predictions to data from literature. Modelled forward-masked spatial tuning curve (fmSTC) widths and slopes and intracochlear electric field profile length constants were obtained for a range of bone resistivity values for the various head models. The predictions were compared to measurements found in literature. It was concluded that, depending on the head model, a bone resistivity value between 3500 Ω cm and 10,500 Ω cm allows prediction of neural and electrical responses that match measured data. A general recommendation is made to use a resistivity value of approximately 10,000 Ω cm for bone volumes in conduction models of the implanted cochlea when neural excitation is predicted and a value of approximately 6500 Ω cm when predicting electric fields inside the cochlear duct.

[1]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability , 2001, Hearing Research.

[2]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[3]  Helge Rask-Andersen,et al.  Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Z. Fuzessery,et al.  Neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences in the sound envelope in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat , 2000, Hearing Research.

[5]  Tiaan Krynauw Malherbe,et al.  Can subject-specific single-fibre electrically evoked auditory brainstem response data be predicted from a model? , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  L. Michaels,et al.  Pathology of the otic capsule , 1990, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[7]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea , 2014, Hearing Research.

[8]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[9]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Threshold Levels of Dual Electrode Stimulation in Cochlear Implants , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[11]  J. Grudzinskas,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery for male subfertility , 1996, BMJ.

[12]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes , 2001, Hearing Research.

[13]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach , 2006, Hearing Research.

[15]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  A. B. Grayeli,et al.  Temporal bone density measurements using CT in otosclerosis , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  Guang Cheng,et al.  Correlation Between Structure and Resistivity Variations of the Live Human Skull , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Darren M. Whiten Electro-anatomical models of the cochlear implant , 2007 .

[19]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[20]  P. V. van Rijen,et al.  Measurement of the Conductivity of Skull, Temporarily Removed During Epilepsy Surgery , 2004, Brain Topography.

[21]  R. K. Kalkman,et al.  Stimulation of the Facial Nerve by Intracochlear Electrodes in Otosclerosis: A Computer Modeling Study , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[24]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[25]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  L H Mens,et al.  Modelling surface potentials from intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[27]  T Hanekom,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spiraling Finite Element Model of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[28]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  Current Distribution in the Brain From Surface Electrodes , 1968, Anesthesia and analgesia.