Multiagent Collaborative Governance for Targeted Poverty Alleviation from the Perspective of Stakeholders

As a social problem involving a wide range of objects, targeted poverty alleviation governance needs to clearly define stakeholders and identify their behaviour choices, so as to seek a multiagent collaborative governance strategy, and strive to jointly promote the realization of a targeted poverty alleviation goals in an atmosphere to win-win cooperation and benefit sharing. By constructing a three-subject evolutionary game model of local government, social organization, and poverty group in the process of targeted poverty alleviation, this paper discusses the influence of their behavioural decisions on multisubject collaborative governance of targeted poverty alleviation and selects samples to carry out simulation experiments on the model. The results show that, first, superior government support has little effect on the evolution of tripartite competition, and the conclusion is inconsistent with the general cognition. However, the enhancement of support from local governments and social organizations can effectively promote the transformation of the willingness of the poor groups to cooperate. Second, a modest increase in the punishment of social organizations and poor groups can have a binding effect on the behavioural strategy choices of both sides and ultimately promote the process of targeted poverty alleviation. Third, the increase in the benefits of social organizations and poor groups can significantly improve the willingness of both sides to cooperate, so the “endogenous driving force” of the poor groups should be enhanced to achieve the Pareto optimal state of targeted poverty alleviation.

[1]  Lili Dong,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with dynamic relationship-based preferential learning , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[2]  Kai Lin,et al.  Vehicle Route Selection Based on Game Evolution in Social Internet of Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[3]  Walter Eberlei Stakeholder Participation in Poverty Reduction , 2007 .

[4]  People vs. poverty: Powering through partnership , 2007 .

[5]  Phil O'Keefe,et al.  The double bind of poverty and community disaster risk reduction: a case study from the Caribbean , 2012 .

[6]  Daniel B Cooney,et al.  The replicator dynamics for multilevel selection in evolutionary games , 2018, Journal of mathematical biology.

[7]  P. Khumalo The Dynamics of Poverty and Poverty Alleviation in South Africa , 2013 .

[8]  G. Wilkinson Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat , 1984, Nature.

[9]  Daniel H. Janzen,et al.  How to be a Fig , 1979 .

[10]  M. Jessoula Europe 2020 and the Fight against Poverty – Beyond Competence Clash, Towards ‘Hybrid’ Governance Solutions? , 2015 .

[11]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies , 2018, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[12]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Chemical mimicry or crypsis—the evolutionary game played by parasitic ants invading other colonies , 2019, Theoretical Ecology.

[13]  Marian Barnes,et al.  Public Participation and Collaborative Governance , 2004, Journal of Social Policy.

[14]  L. Packer,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids , 1998 .