Identification of High-Risk Patients After ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison Between Angiographic and Magnetic Resonance Parameters
暂无分享,去创建一个
O. Rimoldi | A. Colombo | P. Camici | A. Durante | A. Laricchia | A. Margonato | A. Esposito | F. de Cobelli | G. Benedetti
[1] A. Radjenovic,et al. Comparative Prognostic Utility of Indexes of Microvascular Function Alone or in Combination in Patients With an Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2016, Circulation.
[2] P. Camici,et al. Novel insights into an "old" phenomenon: the no reflow. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.
[3] K. Sakakura,et al. Transient no reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention , 2014, Heart and Vessels.
[4] C. Reid,et al. Usefulness of transient and persistent no reflow to predict adverse clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2012, American Journal of Cardiology.
[5] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.
[6] F. Burzotta,et al. Thrombus aspiration in ST elevation myocardial infarction: comparative efficacy in patients treated early and late after onset of symptoms , 2010, Heart.
[7] S. Iliceto,et al. Relationship between myocardial blush grades, staining, and severe microvascular damage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention a study performed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance in a large consecutive series of patients. , 2010, American heart journal.
[8] R. Kloner,et al. Coronary no‐reflow phenomenon: From the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[9] P. Algra,et al. Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: comparison between angiography, electrocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular injury. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[10] F. Fedele,et al. The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling: results of the multicenter AMICI study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] A. Banning,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention and the no-reflow phenomenon , 2007, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.
[12] R. Kornowski,et al. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.
[13] M. Josephson,et al. Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] G. Parodi,et al. Impact of Microvascular Dysfunction on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Circulation.
[15] I. Porto,et al. Temporal evolution and functional outcome of no reflow: sustained and spontaneously reversible patterns following successful coronary recanalisation , 2003, Heart.
[16] Felix Zijlstra,et al. Angiographic Assessment of Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Myocardial Blush Grade , 2003, Circulation.
[17] E. Braunwald,et al. Relationship of the TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grades, Flow Grades, Frame Count, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Long-Term Outcomes After Thrombolytic Administration in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2002, Circulation.
[18] M. Kern,et al. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies. , 2001, European heart journal.
[19] H. Suryapranata,et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 1998, Circulation.
[20] Katherine C. Wu,et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.
[21] Felix Zijlstra,et al. Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction , 1997, The Lancet.
[22] D. Julian. Treatment of cardiac arrest in acute myocardial ischaemia and infarction. , 1961, Lancet.
[23] Baris Gencer,et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2011 .
[24] S. Rizzo,et al. The metamorphosis of myocardial infarction following coronary recanalization. , 2010, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.
[25] H. S. Mueller,et al. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.